Assembly Candidates Should Take Stand: Will Ohio Raise Taxes Or Will Ohio Cut State Services?

Yesterday Martin Gottlieb in his DDN commentary complained, “What a snore the ‘races’ for county office have been in Montgomery County.”

Gottlieb should have included in his indictment the five races in the county for the Ohio House (Ohio House Districts 36 – 40) and the one county race for Ohio Senate (the 6th).  Gottlieb’s question — Where’s the fire? — is a great question.  Why aren’t the candidates for the State Assembly debating the real issue each Assembly member will eventually need to take a stand on:  How to solve the Ohio’s huge budget crisis?

Ohio budget expert, Richard Sheridan, writing in November’s State Budgeting Matters says that hard choices await Ohio’s new State Assembly when it prepares the next state budget.  Ohio is experiencing a huge shortfall in revenue and the next Assembly will need to choose to either raise taxes or to make deep cuts in Ohio’s social services.

Ohio’s financial emergency should be the focus of the State Assembly races, but no candidate is talking about it and no one in the media is challenging Assembly candidates to deal with the issue.  See Ohio Budget Expert, Richard Sheridan: “Ohio’s Budget Problems Are A Long Way From Being Solved And One-Time Fixes Have Dried Up”

And see, Chris Widener, Republican Senate Candidate, Boasts About Tax Cuts, But How Will He Solve Ohio’s Budget Crisis?

Sheridan says that Ohio is not alone, that at least 28 other states are facing a severe budget crunch.  Sheridan says, “The pattern is to first use up budget reserves, layoff some state employees, and then cut non-education and non-human services spending. As budget problems worsen, education and human services programs then face the chopping blocks.”

Sheridan quotes The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which is regularly tracking state budget problems.  The Center notes that 22 states have taken actions that reduce services to their residents, especially their most vulnerable families and individuals:

  • “For example, at least 14 states have implemented or are considering cuts that will affect low-income children’s or families’ eligibility for health insurance or reduce their access to health care services.
  • Programs for the elderly and disabled are also being cut.
  • At least 11 states are cutting medical, rehabilitative, home care, or other services needed by low-income people who are elderly or have disabilities, or significantly increasing the cost of these services.
  • At least 13 states are cutting or proposing to cut K-12 and early education; several of them are also reducing access to child care and early education, and at least 17 states have implemented or proposed cuts to public colleges and universities.
  • In addition, at least 19 states have proposed or implemented reductions to their state workforce. Workforce reductions often result in reduced access to services residents need. They also add to states’ woes by contracting the state economy.”
Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Leave a comment

Top DaytonOS Posts In Last 30 Days

It is interesting how content drives readership, how it is that viewers find a site, because Google or some other search engine has directed them to the site. The number one post in the last 30 days, with 521 hits, was an article that contained PDF files of the exact language of the five state-wide issues.

  1. See Exact Language For Four Proposed Amendments 521
  2. See List of Montgomery County Candidates 258
  3. As Richard Cooey Faces Execution, Does245
  4. Oktoberfest 2008 at the Dayton Art Institute 222
  5. Kucinich Says $700 Billion Bail Out Should 203
  6. Issue 6: Columbus Dispatch Urges “No” Vote 196
  7. Noted Economist, Satyajit Das, Compares 165
  8. Nouriel Roubini, Prescient Economist Kno 158
  9. “We Learned A Terrible Lesson,” Only One 150
  10. Obama Rally Draws Enthusiastic Crowd To 140
  11. Fannie And Freddie Not Responsible For H 123
  12. Does The Rise Of Sarah Palin Illustrate The Peter Principle At Work? 112
  13. Paul Krugman: “Ugly Financial Crisis Wi 111
  14. Mike Turner’s “No” Vote Was Attempt To Boost His “Conservative” Credentials 106
  15. Naomi Klein Says Economic Crises Repudiates Milton Friedman Doctrines, Right-wing Trotskyists 102
  16. “Stealing America One Vote At A Time” At Neon Movies Next Wednesday, Oct.1 99
  17. Thomas Friedman: Putting A Total Novice Like Sarah Palin In Charge Would Be “Flat Out Reckless,” The Opposite Of Conservative 99
  18. Mike Turner Is A Bum, For Our Democracy’s Sake, Let’s Throw The Bum Out 98
  19. Mike Turner Votes “No” On Bailout ; Boehner Blames Pelosi For Bill’s Defeat 97
  20. Dan Lipsky involved in consumer fraud? 96
  21. Candidates are Certified for March 4 Primary — Few Primary Contests Have Competition 93
  22. Montgomery County Jail Computer SNAFU stops visits 90
  23. Nouriel Roubini Warns Of Possible “Mother Of All Bank Runs,” Urges Morgan Stanley and Goldmam Sachs To Find Foreign Buyers 89
  24. Presidential Slogans: 2008, the year of the fully marketed president 85
  25. Is This The End For The GOP? 78
  26. Chief Economic Advisor To Kucinich Decries $700 Billion Bail Out, Asks, “Where Are The Revolutionists Today?77
  27. Is This Church Violating IRS Tax Exempt Rules 70
  28. John Doll Says: Jon Husted Won’t Live In District, And If Elected, Won’t Finish Term 69
  29. Obama’s Fraudulent ACORN Campaign 68
  30. Shouldn’t How To Increase Wealth, How To Fairly Distribute Wealth, Be At The Center Of Our Political Debate? 68
  31. State Budget Bill Includes Millions in Pork 68
  32. Charlie Gibson, ABC World News, Visits Dayton 64
  33. For Congressman Mike Turner, “Pork Has Been a Family Affair” — Mother Jones 57
  34. Chris Widener, Republican Senate Candidate, Boasts About Tax Cuts, But How Will He Solve Ohio’s Budget Crisis? 56
  35. How To Make The DDN / WMUB Election Forum More Educative 54
Posted in Special Reports | 9 Comments

Steve Austria Denies The DDN Charge That He Is Mediocre

Steve Austria, today, writing in the DDN, denied that he is mediocre and listed legislative accomplishments to attempt to prove his point. Austria is the Republican candidate to represent Ohio’s 7th District in the US Congress, to replace retiring Republican, David Hobson.

Austria’s article responded to the DDN’s prior endorsement of Austria’s Democratic opponent, Sharen Neuhardt. The DDN’s October 17 editorial urged its readers to choose Neuhardt saying, “Neuhardt is the smarter, bolder choice for 7th District,” and warned that if Austria is elected this year, the 7th District is likely to be stuck with him. The DDN wrote, “If the voters of the 7th District choose Sen. Austria, they are settling for mediocrity, quite possibly on a long-term basis.“

The newspaper seems to be encouraging Republicans in the 7th District, rather than settle for mediocrity, to reject Austria and to use the next two years to find a stronger, more imaginative Republican — one who would be worthy of support for a long career.

Austria in his ads emphasizes that he is “conservative” and accuses Neuhardt of being a “liberal trial lawyer with extreme views.” But the DDN in its editorial endorsement said Neuhardt is in the “mainstream” and, in fact, in 2006 voted for incumbent congressman, Republican Dave Hobson.

Austria makes a big deal in his TV ads that he is all in favor of making Bush’s tax cuts to the wealthy permanent. The biggest beneficiary of that tax cut, by far, was incomes in excess of $250,000. Austria brags that in the Ohio Assembly he helped pass Ohio’s 2005 Tax Reduction Act, but, again doesn’t say that this tax cut disproportionately benefited top incomes. The 2005 law reduced personal income taxes by $2.2 billion each year. What Austria doesn’t say in his ad is that Ohio’s 2005 law, that he helped construct, gave 26% of this big tax cut to a very small group of taxpayers — to incomes in excess of $340,000, averaging about $650,000.

The original DDN editorial that rejected Austria had two parts. The second part used a strong word in the headline — “shameless” — to describe Austria’s attacks on Neuhardt for befriending a Rwandan refugee, and suggests that Austria is engaging in “gutter politics of the most despicable sort.” Austria likes to use the word “harboring,” but the DDN defends Neuhardt’s actions in helping this refugee and shames Austria for making her generosity in doing so a matter of political attack.

The DDN says, “Sen. Austria points to the case as symbolic of the country’s immigration problem. Not even close. This isn’t about people crossing the southern border in pursuit of jobs. This country’s policy of providing asylum to people who face persecution — bureaucratic as the process is — speaks to our sense of humanity. Sen. Austria needs to display that same sense of decency.”

Here is an exchange between Austria and Neuhardt, during their debate, about the Rwandan refugee:

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment