Showing Leadership On Reapportionment Presents Governor Strickland With Big Opportunity

In writing the article on gerrymandering, I was surprised to discover that, according to the Dispatch article written in May 2006, Republicans DeWine and Husted staked out the high ground on the issue of reapportionment.  The Dispatch, in the article I quoted, says that the Reform Ohio Now group supported the Republican proposal, but Democratic Assembly members refused to support it.

I’m wondering if in the intervening years, particularly after the election of Governor Strickland, Democrats ever tried to stake out a credible position, a high ground, about reapportionment?

Reapportionment is an issue that won’t go away, and, it seems to me, it is an issue Governor Strickland should get squarely in front of.  I think voters would reward Strickland if he would show positive leadership on this important issue.

Strickland should take a problem solving stand and show leadership in creating a plan by which reapportionment would strengthen our democracy.

By showing leadership on the issue of reapportionment, I believe, Strickland would gain a lot of political capital, a lot of widespread support.  Ohioans want their democracy to work.  It is failing miserably here in Montgomery County, and the reason it is failing is directly tied to how Ohio reapportions its legislative districts.

Governor Strickland has a big opportunity to show leadership and gain a lot of public support by taking a pro democracy stand concerning reapportionment.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | 2 Comments

President Obama Will Use The Internet To Effectively Govern

<a href=”http://technorati.com/claim/i43rh6sgxy” rel=”me”>Technorati Profile</a>
Interesting article in The New York Times, How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ Power, says, “Like a lot of Web innovators, the Obama campaign did not invent anything completely new. … when he arrives at 1600 Pennsylvania, Mr. Obama will have not just a political base, but a database, millions of names of supporters who can be engaged almost instantly. And there’s every reason to believe that he will use the network not just to campaign, but to govern.

Excerpts from the article:

  • His e-mail message to supporters on Tuesday night included the line, “We have a lot of work to do to get our country back on track, and I’ll be in touch soon about what comes next.” The incoming administration is already open for business on the Web at Change.gov, a digital gateway for the transition.
  • The Bush campaign arrived at the White House with a conviction that it would continue a conservative revolution with the help of Karl Rove’s voter lists, phone banks and direct mail. But those tools were crude and expensive compared with what the Obama camp is bringing to the Oval Office.
  • The juxtaposition of a networked, open-source campaign and a historically imperial office will have profound implications and raise significant questions. Special-interest groups and lobbyists will now contend with an environment of transparency and a president who owes them nothing. The news media will now contend with an administration that can take its case directly to its base without even booking time on the networks.
  • “Thomas Jefferson used newspapers to win the presidency, F.D.R. used radio to change the way he governed, J.F.K. was the first president to understand television, and Howard Dean saw the value of the Web for raising money,” said Ranjit Mathoda, a lawyer and money manager who blogs at Mathoda.com. “But Senator Barack Obama understood that you could use the Web to lower the cost of building a political brand, create a sense of connection and engagement, and dispense with the command and control method of governing to allow people to self-organize to do the work.”
  • Like every other presidency, the Obama administration will have its battles with the media, but that may seem like patty-cake if it runs afoul of the self-publishing, self-organizing democracy it helped create — say, by delaying health care legislation or breaking a promise on taxes.
  • “It’s clear there has been a dramatic shift,” said Andrew Rasiej, the founder of the Personal Democracy Forum, an annual conference about the intersection of politics and technology. “Any politician who fails to recognize that we are in a post-party era with a new political ecology in which connecting like minds and forming a movement is so much easier will not be around long.
Posted in Dayton Blog Feeds | 3 Comments

Organized Opposition Contributed to Centerville’s School Levy Defeat

I was surprised to see that voters in Centerville  defeated Centerville’s 5.9 mill school levy —  17,177 voters, 52%, said, “No.” For Centerville to defeat a school levy is surprising.

Active local opposition to school levies is always bad news for schools seeking to increase school taxes.  Looking around the web, I found a web-site that was in active opposition to the levy.

The message from the web-site is that much of the income from the proposed level would go to Centerville’s teachers and administrators, and that teachers and administrators already are making plenty.  The web-site lists the salaries of teachers and administrators in various income categories.

The web-site says, “Vote YES if you want school employees who work 180 days a year, and have their health and dental bills paid and make more than you do to get another raise and unlike you can’t be laid off or let go.”

The web-site said, “One of the reasons that are school costs are so high are salaries paid to employees. Now everyone understands that teachers should be paid a reasonable amount. But we need to keep in mind that teachers work 180 days per year while you, the tax payer, works 270 days per year. Oh and by the way a teacher can’t be fired after three (3) years without cause unlike you. You can be let go at your employers will at any time. There are 136 teachers and others paid over $70,000.00 per year. How Much are you Paid?”

It would be impossible to know what effect this opposition group had on defeating the levy.  I wondering if a bigger factor in the defeat of the levy was skepticism from a lot of Centerville voters as to whether a new levy was actually needed.  If I’m reading the Centerville’s Treasurer’s Report accurately, it seems that the School Treasurer, regardless of the failure of the levy, is projecting a cash balance of over $8 million for July, 2009.

According to the District’s web-site, regardless of the outcome of the levy, teacher salaries are determined through 2011 by a contract already negotiated.  The current contract increased base salaries by 4.0% for 2007-2008; 2.0% for 2008-2009; 2.5% for 2009-2010; and 3.0% for 2010-2011.

Centerville is a top rated school in Ohio.  Centerville Superintendent, Gary Smiga, in the fall’s school newsletter wrote, “On Tuesday, August 26, the Ohio Department of Education announced their ‘School Report Card’ results for the 2007-08 school year. We learned for the 10th consecutive year the Centerville City Schools would again receive Ohio’s highest rating. Since the inception of this state report card only 13 of 614 Ohio public school districts can make this claim and we are in very good company with districts like Brecksville, Granville, Mason, Oakwood, Solon, and Wyoming.”

Posted in Special Reports | 17 Comments