Ohio’s Overcrowded Prisons Have Record Number Of Inmates, Yet Face Budget Cuts

The Warren Tribune Chronicle reports, “State Prisons Face Budget Cuts,” that the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction is facing budget cuts at a time when Ohio has more prisoners than ever, holding 33 percent more inmates than its facilities were intended to hold, and when the whole system is facing budget cuts in the next biennium.

Excerpts from the article:

  • Ohio’s prison system is at its highest inmate level ever, with 51,000 inmates being housed across the state in prisons that had been designed to hold 38,300. Warren’s state prison, Trumbull Correctional Institution, is at 148 percent of capacity, holding 1,340 inmates. The Leavittsburg-area prison was designed to hold 902.
  • Adding to a bleak situation, earlier this month, Strickland released a state budget ”worst-case scenario,” pointing out that the state is facing a $7.3 billion deficit in the next two years based on current tax revenue projections, which are heading downward as all major economics indicators have plummeted.
  • Without Washington’s help, state agencies would need to cut 25 percent off their current funding levels if the state wants to preserve Medicaid, a tax reduction and continue making debt payments, Strickland said.
  • ”We are facing historic times with the state of Ohio,” Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections Director, Terry J. Collins said. ”We have made no decisions on anything at this particular point in time. I have talked to legislators about various potential changes. It comes down to a pretty simple theory.” That theory includes looking at other forms of punishment, including alternate sentencing programs, GPS tracking with ankle bracelets, halfway houses and simply accepting the fact that not everyone has to be in prison to be punished, Collins said.
  • ”There’s only so much you can cut,” state Rep. Tom Letson, D-Warren, said. ”But revenue is down, and we’re trying to cut without increasing any taxes.” ”It’s almost impossible to close any (prison) without setting people free,” state Sen. Robert Hagan said.
  • The two officials are stuck in the middle of the bleak budget scenario that already has given way to threats of closing state parks and raising college tuition. ”We won’t get the budget until February, and I heard 5 to 7.5 billion has to be cut,” Letson said.
  • Hagan said across-the-board cuts from 10 to 25 percent certainly would mean a long, hard look to the prison system, where inmates require between $26,000 to $52,000 a year to remain behind bars.
  • Some officials have called for the elimination of 5,237 positions at the state prisons department, including corrections and parole officers. Ohio also would close six institutions at a time when prisons already are crowded. Many treatment and job programs for inmates would be cut. And the trickle-down effect also could mean cuts for alternative sentencing programs such as Northeast Ohio Community Alternative Program (NEOCAP), located in Warren.
  • Hagan said it’s more likely officials in the prison system, which includes 32 institutions and two privately run prisons, will make the call on who gets laid off and who gets released. The system also includes Trumbull Correctional Institution, one of the more modern prisons in the state. ”You risk the chance of more or increased violence in the prisons if they’re overcrowded,” Hagan said.
  • He said the state most likely will depend on major increases in the area of house arrest and electronic monitoring of inmates removed from prisons.”And those inmates have to be first-time and nonviolent offenders,” he said.
Posted in Special Reports | Tagged | 38 Comments

Media Matters Urges Its Readers To Protest NBC’s Planned Ann Coulter Broadcast

Media Matters is urging its readers to contact NBC and protest the network’s plans to feature Ann Coulter and allow her to promote her new book on national television. The following is the Media Matters letter:

Dear Friend,
As you know, Ann Coulter has a long history of making controversial statements. In media appearances and her syndicated column, Coulter has likened President-elect Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler repeatedly, called Al Gore a “total fag,” and written that without affirmative action, African-American Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) couldn’t get a job “that didn’t involve wearing a paper hat.” She has also repeatedly discussed potential acts of violence against people she doesn’t like or with whom she disagrees, including saying of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: “We need somebody to put rat poison in Justice Stevens’ crème brulee.”

» Call NBC and ask why they are reportedly again helping Coulter promote her latest book despite past condemnations by NBC staff for her history of reprehensible comments.
Despite this long and well-documented history of controversial statements, NBC has once again reportedly invited Coulter to promote her latest book on its airwaves. On Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes, during a segment in which she called Obama an “atheist” and asked if “we could get all of his aliases before he’s sworn in on the Quran,” Coulter announced that she is scheduled to appear on the January 6, 2009, broadcast of NBC’s Today.

Enough is enough. Even NBC-affiliated hosts and anchors have expressed disgust over some of Coulter’s more offensive rhetoric. Today co-host Meredith Vieira has acknowledged that the media are part of the problem, saying “we’re perpetuating it.”

» Call NBC and ask why they are reportedly again helping Coulter promote her latest book despite past condemnations by NBC staff for her history of reprehensible comments.
It is time to hold NBC accountable. In light of both her history and the numerous condemnations of her by NBC staff, the network should reconsider reportedly providing her with a platform from which to make these comments.

Call NBC today and let them know what you think.
Thank you for your continued support.

Eric Burns
President
Media Matters for America

Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

A 21st Century Understanding: The Christmas Story Tells That In Every Baby The Human Race Can Start Anew

The Christmas story is a story about a supernatural event, a miracle — God, Himself, bursting into history. Angels, God’s messengers, supernatural beings, announce a new reality — a reality beyond nature and beyond human understanding — God, Himself, has come to earth in human form as a baby.

The Christmas story proclaims that God, a being outside of nature, intervenes in human history to save mankind and to exercise His authority on planet earth.

Suddenly, the glory of the Lord shone all about them.

Suddenly, the glory of the Lord shone all about them.

But, the idea that a force outside of nature, God, can burst into history at any moment has a dark side. Apocalyptic thinking relies on such a view of God, and such thinking often leads to deadly results. According to an article in New York Times, “Waiting for Armageddon,” 50 million Americans believe that these are the “last days” and that, once again, as at that first Christmas, God will intervene in history: Christ will suddenly appear in the sky, in glory, and history will be forever changed.

These “last days,” according to these believers, may involve mass deaths, nuclear annihilation, incredible wars and destruction — but, in the end, God will intervene and everything will be OK. Such irresponsible and irrational thinking almost glories in anticipation of the negative; such thinking hampers motivation to do the hard work needed to create a positive future — the hard work needed to build a more just, a more safe, a more wonderful world.

Such irrational thinking begins with a literal belief in the Christmas story — with a belief that a force outside of history, outside of nature, burst into reality some 2000 years ago — and projects that story of the supernatural to a scenario where supernatural intervention saves mankind from the annihilation of the “end times.” This is a very dangerous way to think.

Certainly irrational thinking, religious radicalism, is a huge threat to the survival of future generations, to the survival of the earth itself. Thoughtful Christians need to find an understanding of their Christian faith that is worthy of a 21st Century understanding, one that does not promote irrational thinking and religious radicalism. Finding a way to understand the Christmas story is a good start. There needs to be an understanding grounded in an appreciation for awe inspiring mystery, but also grounded in a reality worthy of a 21st Century understanding.

A 21st Century understanding of the Christmas story, it seems to me, should inspire us to contemplate that human life itself is mysterious, beyond our understanding, and perhaps, even beyond our capacity to understand. A 21st contemplation of the story of Christmas must deal with the concept of human destiny. The Christmas story is the story of the birth of a baby, a baby who grew into his potential. We don’t need choirs of angels to know that every baby has a great potential beyond our comprehension — a potential to do good, a potential to help raise humanity to new heights of compassion, justice, truth and love. The Christmas story is a story of great hope; it says that in every baby the human race can start anew.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | 3 Comments