Mayor McClin’s DDN Response To Cal Thomas’ Dayton Bashing Is Disappointing

Interesting exchange in today’s Dayton Daily News.  Evidently, the DDN alerted Dayton Mayor Rhine McLin about a Cal Thomas column that ridicules Dayton’s leadership, and, so, on the editorial page is the Thomas article along with McClin’s response.

Thomas claims that Dayton contributed to a wish list sent to congress by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and that among its possible requests was for funding for a program to help rehabilitate Dayton prostitutes.

Thomas writes, “Here’s one proposal I especially like: $1.5 million for an initiative in Dayton, Ohio, for the ‘Reduce Prostitution — Off the Streets Program.’ The proposed spending would ‘connect individuals involved in prostitution with resources to leave a life of prostitution.’”

The headline of the article — Cities like Dayton are singing ‘Here comes Santa Claus’ — captures the contempt communicated in Thomas’ writing.

Mayor McLin’s response was headlined “Cal Thomas misses point of city survey,” and starts, “Syndicated columnist Cal Thomas uses a survey distributed by the U.S. Conference of Mayors to suggest that cities are irresponsibly seeking assistance from the federal government to help with a variety of community challenges.”

McClin writes that Dayton responded to a survey:  “The survey responses do lay out the host of challenges we face, the efforts we have initiated on our own to deal with those issues, and the associated costs of those efforts. The point of the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ survey, and the corresponding response from cities, is to clearly illustrate the vast problems confronting local communities.”

McLin’s words in her response are so generalized that she fails to enlighten.  McClin never deals directly with Thomas’ charge — that on Dayton’s wish list is a wish to find $1.5 million in funding that would help rehabilitate Dayton’s prostitutes — so the end result is that a reader must assume that Thomas’ charge is true.

McClin’s concludes:  “We do not apologize for identifying the challenges we are up against to provide a high quality of life for residents, businesses and visitors. We only wish there weren’t so many.  Sadly, without an economic stimulus package targeted specifically to help cities, more will be added to the list.”

This is all very good.  Rah Rah Rah, but it doesn’t really say anything.  I read McClin’s response before I read Thomas’s article and I really couldn’t understand by reading McClin what she was writing about.

If Dayton’s leadership has created a list of challenges — and possible price tags for dealing with those challenges — I would like to see the list.  McClin had an opportunity in today’s DDN to share that list and the thinking of Dayton leadership in making that list.  Her failure to use her opportunity to make an effective response is disappointing.  She should have dealt with Thomas’ sarcasm and accusations head on.  Her non-response undermines her leadership because it makes her appear to lack courage to communicate truthfully and completely.

If there is a $1.5 million prostitution rehabilitation project of the list, as Thomas charges, then, when given the opportunity, McClin should have responded, specifically.  I’m thinking there is probably a strong defense for promoting such a project.

Mayor McClin should reconsider her weak response to the contemptuous Cal Thomas article, and, the mayor should try again.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Paul Krugman Says Financial Sector Yearly Has $400 Billion In Waste And Fraud

Paul Krugman’s column in the New York Times today, “The Madoff Economy,” uses the $50 billion ponzi scheme of Bernard Madoff to slam the whole investment industry. Krugman says that it appears that every year there is at least $400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse in the financial sector and that this slosh of money has corrupted our whole economic and political system.

Krugman asks: “How different, really, is Mr. Madoff’s tale from the story of the investment industry as a whole? The financial services industry has claimed an ever-growing share of the nation’s income over the past generation, making the people who run the industry incredibly rich. Yet, at this point, it looks as if much of the industry has been destroying value, not creating it. And it’s not just a matter of money: the vast riches achieved by those who managed other people’s money have had a corrupting effect on our society as a whole.”

Excerpts:

  • Last year, the average salary of employees in “securities, commodity contracts, and investments” was more than four times the average salary in the rest of the economy. Earning a million dollars was nothing special, and even incomes of $20 million or more were fairly common. … The pay system on Wall Street lavishly rewards the appearance of profit, even if that appearance later turns out to have been an illusion.
  • Consider the hypothetical example of a money manager who leverages up his clients’ money with lots of debt, then invests the bulked-up total in high-yielding but risky assets … Then, when the bubble bursts and his investments turn into toxic waste, his investors will lose big — but he’ll keep those bonuses.
  • In recent years the finance sector accounted for 8 percent of America’s G.D.P., up from less than 5 percent a generation earlier. If that extra 3 percent was money for nothing — and it probably was — we’re talking about $400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse.
  • Wall Street’s ill-gotten gains corrupted and continue to corrupt politics, in a nicely bipartisan way. From Bush administration officials like Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who looked the other way as evidence of financial fraud mounted, to Democrats who still haven’t closed the outrageous tax loophole that benefits executives at hedge funds and private equity firms (hello, Senator Schumer), politicians have walked when money talked.
  • There’s an innate tendency on the part of even the elite to idolize men who are making a lot of money, and assume that they know what they’re doing. After all, that’s why so many people trusted Mr. Madoff.
  • Now, as we survey the wreckage and try to understand how things can have gone so wrong, so fast, the answer is actually quite simple: What we’re looking at now are the consequences of a world gone Madoff.
Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who “Deserves” To Be Named Senator?

Kathleen Parker, writing on the opinion page of today’s Dayton Daily News, says, “Kennedy may not deserve seat, but it doesn’t matter.” Parker writes that, in her judgment, New York’s Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, is more deserving to be appointed US senator than Caroline Kennedy.

Parker’s assumption seems to be that discerning who is the most deserving should be the determining factor that should guide the New York governor’s choice of who to appoint to the US Senate. Evidently Parker has a criteria to judge deservingness in which Cuomo is considered more deserving because he has a longer history of public service than Kennedy, that he has worked harder, that he has accomplished more.

But, it seems to me, another way of thinking about who “deserves” appointment is to think in terms of who most deserves to be given great trust. Who deserves to be considered incorruptible and whose ideas deserve to be listened to?

Ultimately, the people our democracy should entrust with decision making authority are those people who have a vision of a common good, who are most committed to working for the common good, and who have the personal capacity to communicate and lead effectively. It is a person’s commitment to and capacity for problem solving, to promoting the general good, that should be the criteria in our democracy that most determines who “deserves” to be awarded political office.

It is a safe bet that Caroline Kennedy, in the US Senate, would be incorruptible and conscientious and that she would be guided by sound principles. I think she would protect and advance the common good and that she would, therefore, make a great senator. Caroline Kennedy, according to the above definition of deservingness that emphasizes the common good, clearly “deserves” top consideration for appointment to the senate.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | Leave a comment