Peace In The World, Or The World In Pieces

Marjorie Cohn in her article, “Israel’s Collective Punishment of Gaza,” says the Gazan War is all about Israel’s coming elections.

Cohn writes: “Israel’s airstrikes and ground assault on the people of Gaza have little to do with the Gazan rockets, which hadn’t killed any Israelis for a year before Israel’s current military operation. Israel’s leaders are bombing and attacking Gaza in order to gain an advantage in the upcoming Israeli elections in February.

“Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni is locked in a tight race with Benyamin Netanyahu, who has criticized Livni for her ‘soft’ treatment of the Palestinians. The Israeli government seeks to do as much damage as possible to Gaza while Bush is still in office. The New York Times cited several Middle East experts who ‘believe that Israel timed its move against Hamas, which began on Dec. 26, 25 days before Mr. Bush leaves office, with the expectation of such backing in Washington.’ Obama, in spite of his unequivocal support for the policies of Israel during the campaign and his deafening silence about the recent casualties, is an unknown quantity.”

What Cohn says sounds to me like the truth.  I wonder if Fox News is saying anything about this reasonable theory:

  1. Israel’s leaders are bombing and attacking Gaza in order to gain an advantage in the upcoming Israeli elections in February.
  2. The Israeli government seeks to do as much damage as possible to Gaza while Bush is still in office.

It rings true to me that because Bush is president, the Israelis feel empowered.  I do not think that Israeli military communication officers would have quite the swagger, quite the pride in their destruction of Gaza and in their disregard for Palestinian life — if Barrack Obama was in charge, rather than George Bush.

According to Cohn, the Israeli politicians — those who are calling the shots on what level of violence should be unleashed in this Gazan War — feel that in the Israeli elections, the political party that appears the most fierce, most willing to use military force, will be the party that wins.

Israeli politicians, I’m sure, would disagree with this charge that Gazan War is all about politics.  But if what Cohn reports is true — the Hamas rockets hadn’t killed any Israelis for a year before Israel’s current military operation — then how else can this Gazan War be explained?

Israel’s leaders, by making violent war, are choosing short term safety over long term peace.  They are making a very bad choice.  In the short run, fewer Hamas rockets may be sent into Israel, but in the long run it seems certain that this Gazan War will simply inspire more terror.

Shimon Peres said to George Stephanopoulos that the purpose of the war was to “stop terror.”  But he must know that his Gazan War will suppress terror only in the short term.

Peres said, “Hamas needs a real and serious lesson. They are now getting it.” Peres’s theory is that if Israel rains down violence and terror on Gaza, Hamas will learn a lesson.  When Israel bombs homes, schools, mosques and kills women and children, the lesson, evidently, that Israel wants to teach is that Israel is willing to take extreme measures to defend itself.

But violence brings more violence.  It makes no sense to fight terrorism with terrorism.  What are needed are long term solutions, and an endless cycle of terror and violence is not an acceptable solution.  Peres is advocating a point of view that should be condemned by thoughtful Israeli and thoughtful US citizens.  War is not the answer and unless humanity changes its warring ways, humanity will have no future worth having.

Peres and other Israeli politicians are selling the idea of safety.  They are defending their unleashing of outrageous violence in Gaza as needed to assure safety.

But to trade peace for safety is a very bad deal.  Ultimately, safety is only possible through peace.  And peace is only possible through justice.  Ultimately, peace is the only hope, the only answer.  Unless humanity awakens to this truth and begins to pursue peace in earnest, today’s children face a miserable future.

I’m thinking of an old song that says, “Peace in the world, or the world in pieces.” Our time to figure it all out seems very short.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Kucinich Says Israel’s Attack On Gazan Civilians, Using US Made Weapons, Violates US Law

Congressman Dennis Kucinich is requesting that Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, investigate whether Israel is in violation of a 1976 law that defines the proper use of US made weapons.

Kucinich points out that US made F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters were used in an attack of a U.N. School where over 40 Palestinians, women and children, were killed while seeking shelter.

Kucinich is requesting that Rice investigate whether Israel has violated the terms of the 1976 Arms Export Control Act and give an immediate report to congress. See Congressman Kucinich’s letter here.

Israel is using US made weapons to rain destruction in Gaza.

Israel is using US made weapons to rain destruction in Gaza.

Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Report On Gazan War — ABC News With George Stephanopoulos — Was A Shameful Disgrace

In the Gazan War, over 500 Palestinians have died, and over one-fourth of the dead are women and children. Many schools, mosques, and homes have been obliterated. The destruction and death in Gaza is horrifying.

But do we understand the Gazan War? It’s hard to know the truth. We are easily overwhelmed by misinformation. Zbigniew Brzenzinski said it well when he appeared on Joe Scarborough’s Fox News program and told Scarborough that his point of view showed “stunningly superficial knowledge.” He told Scarborough that, “it is almost embarrassing to listen to you.”

Our mainstream media contributes to our collective ignorance, our “stunningly superficial knowledge.” Sunday’s ABC News program, “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” gives a good example. Israeli President Shimon Peres started by stating, “Well, clearly, if there is somebody can stop terror with a different strategy, we shall accept it. … Hamas needs a real and serious lesson. They are now getting it.”

Peres advanced the theory that the only way to fight terrorism is by advancing greater terrorism. His point of view on Stephanopoulos’s show was not challenged.

Peres was followed by Senator Dick Durbin who fell all over himself proving how much he agrees with Peres. Then Senator Mitch McConnell appeared and pronounced, “Imagine in this country if somebody from a neighboring country were lobbing shells at our population. We’d do exactly the same thing. I think the Israelis are doing the only thing they can possibly do to defend their population.”

The only thing they can possibly do? This military action is costing at least $100 million every day. So the financial cost of this war will be well over one billion dollars. This is the only way such a huge amount of money could possibly be spent to advance peace? This is crazy thinking. How much would an antimissle shield cost to implement? (Israel has a system called the Iron Dome ready to go.)

George Will, later in the program, echoed McConnell and said “The population of Gaza is about the same as population of Tiguana, Mexico — on the border with San Diago. All Americans understand what we would be doing if rockets were landing from Tiguana to Sandiago.”

We do? We would be killing whole Tiguanan families? Bombing churches and schools? We would be targeting leaders for assassination, via 2000 pound bombs, regardless of “collateral damage”? We would be raining phosphorus on the civilian population? I don’t think so.

But there were no dissenting comments on Stephanopoulos’s program (with the exception of a few oblique remarks from Katrina Vanden Heuvel). All the guests and all of the reports were on message: it’s all the fault of Hamas, it’s all because of the rockets; if the US were similarly attacked, our response would be the same; Israel had no choice but to make war.

The stunning superficiality of Stephanopoulos’s Sunday program was amazing. There was no effort to give any context, no effort to give any historical perspective. There was not a word about Israel’s embargo of Gaza, no word of the suffering of the Palestinians, no analysis of the history of the region.

To allow McConnell’s assertion — “the Israelis are doing the only thing they can possibly do to defend their population” — to go unchallenged was outrageous. To allow George Will to go unchallenged when he made a crazy comparison of Gaza and Israel to Tiguana and San Diago was absurd.

To advance the notion, on a supposed news program, that ham fisted military action is the only answer to Hamas and that the US in some parallel situation would mimic Israel — killing whole families, destroying churches and schools as a means to teach a terrorist group a “lesson” — was ridiculous.

Any reasonable analysis of the Gazan war would examine why Israel is making war at this time — rather than waiting, or rather than working for a cease fire. Stephanoupolous failed to mention how the upcoming elections in Israel might influence the political leaders’ move to war, or how the coming inauguration of Barack Obama might have influenced the Israeli decision for immediate war. Stephanoupolous allowed to stand the notion that there was urgency for war and that war was the only option.

Why in the world would a news program present only one side, one point of view? Simon Peres, George Will, Dick Durban, and Mitch McConnell on Stephanopolus’ program were all singing in harmony — making ridiculous comments and ridiculous claims — “The Israeli’s are doing the only thing possible, we would do the same. The only way to fight terrorism is through terrorism.” If Joe Scarborough would have been there, I’m sure, he would have chimed in loudly. I expect such perfect propaganda from Scarborough and Fox News, but not from George. What a disappointment. Stephanopolus’s Sunday program was a shameful disgrace.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | 3 Comments