Thomas Friedman Says In Order To Meet The Challenges Of The Future, The US Needs Better Citizens

Thomas Friedman fears that our democracy is so broken it will not be able to meet the big challenges of the future.  In “Advice From Grandma,” he cites six stubborn realities that are paralyzing America:

  1. Money in politics has become so pervasive that lawmakers have to spend most of their time raising it, selling their souls to those who have it or defending themselves from the smallest interest groups with deep pockets that can trump the national interest.
  2. The gerrymandering of political districts means politicians of each party can now choose their own voters and never have to appeal to the center.
  3. The cable TV culture encourages shouting and segregating people into their own political echo chambers.
  4. A permanent presidential campaign leaves little time for governing.
  5. The Internet, which, at its best, provides a check on elites and establishments and opens the way for new voices and, which, at its worst provides a home for every extreme view and spawns digital lynch mobs from across the political spectrum that attack anyone who departs from their specific orthodoxy.
  6. A U.S. business community that has become so globalized that it only comes to Washington to lobby for its own narrow interests; it rarely speaks out anymore in defense of national issues like health care, education and open markets.

Friedman wonders if the “failed state” of California is a prelude to the coming failed state status of America.  Friedman says the hope that leaders such as Schwarzenegger and Obama might make a difference is turning to disappointment.

Friedman writes, “The standard answer is that we need better leaders. The real answer is that we need better citizens. We need citizens who will convey to their leaders that they are ready to sacrifice, even pay, yes, higher taxes, and will not punish politicians who ask them to do the hard things. Otherwise, folks, we’re in trouble. A great power that can only produce suboptimal responses to its biggest challenges will, in time, fade from being a great power.”

Posted in Special Reports | 18 Comments

If We AreTo Have A Great Future, The Ascending Issue In Our Democracy Must Be Democracy Itself

One great feature of trying to maintain a web log is that, over time, you accumulate a lot of thoughts. Two years ago, I would not have guessed that the biggest theme in my web log history would turn out to be democracy. I recently searched through the DaytonOS archive and found these articles. I’m rereading these articles and finding it valuable to refresh my thinking.

  1. The Ascending Issue In Our Democracy Is Democracy Itself, September 17, 2007
  2. Our Democracy Must Be Revived — If We Hope To Achieve The Dreams of Our Wisest and Best, November 28, 2007
  3. The Montgomery Democrats Decide to Suppress Democracy — Just Like the Republicans, December 14, 2007
  4. For Our Future’s Sake, We Must Transform Our System of Elitism To a System of Democracy, December 20, 2007
  5. Grassroots Dayton: “Sowing The Seeds Of Democracy”, April 11, 2008
  6. The Transcendent Challenge Dayton Must Solve In Order To Be Assured Of A Great Future, April 24, 2008
  7. How Grassroots Dayton Can Build Democracy By Building Community, May 13, 2008
  8. Non-Partisan Action Is Needed To Strengthen And Support Our Local Democracy, May 28, 2008
  9. Let’s Bring Back Lincoln Douglas Style Debates To Today’s Campaigns, September 9, 2008
  10. Showing Leadership On Reapportionment Presents Governor Strickland With Big Opportunity, November 10, 2008
  11. In Montgomery County, Once Again, Gerrymandering Triumphs Over Democracy, November 10, 2008
  12. Mike Turner Is A Bum, For Our Democracy’s Sake, Let’s Throw The Bum Out, October 16, 2008
  13. John Goodlad Says Public Must Agree On “The Democratic Purpose Of Public Schooling”, December 16, 2008
  14. Congressman Mike Turner’s Failure To Explain His “No” Vote Is More Evidence Our Democracy Is In Deep Trouble, January 29, 2009
  15. How Can The System Known As The United States Be Made To Work To Provide “Liberty and Justice For All”?, February 5, 2009
  16. Our Democracy Is Failing And It’s All Your Fault — So, Buy My Book, March 14, 2009
  17. John Glenn, In 1974, As Un-Endorsed Candidate, Denied Admission To Montgomery County Democratic HQ, February 20, 2009
  18. President Obama Must Make This Wake-Up Call To Action: Our System Of Democracy Has Failed Us, February 27, 2009
  19. Mark Owens Says Most Montgomery Dems Approve The Party’s Suppression Of Primary Participation, April 8, 2009
  20. The “Yes” Vote: Only 14% Of Registered Voters Needed In Kettering In Order For Antidemocratic Forces To Win, May 6, 2009
  21. Advice For Gary Leitzell And David Esrati: Make The Campaign All About Democracy, System Structure, May 7, 2009
  22. Our Community’s Success Depends On Whether Residents Can Be Persuaded To Behave Like Citizens, May 12, 2009
  23. Kettering School Board Members Failed In Their Responsibility To Be Guardians Of “Local Control”, May 26, 2009
  24. Local School Board Races Offer Grassroot Activist Opportunity — Grassroots Dayton Makes Plans, June 19, 2009
  25. We Are The Ones To Make A Better Place, July 7, 2009
  26. Vitalizing Our Democracy Is Advanced — If We Can Make Building Democracy An Entrepreneurial Opportunity, July 10, 2009
  27. The Kettering School Board’s Biggest Challenge Is To Gain Public Support For Transformation, September 10, 2009
  28. Kettering Public Education In The Year 2022: How Do We Get To A Great Future?, September 25, 2009
  29. Incumbents’ Refusal To Participate In Public Forum Reveals The Weak State Of Our Democracy, October 29, 2009
Posted in Special Reports | 43 Comments

In Kettering, 3 Out Of 10 Who Voted For School Board Members Chose BOCK

I came in dead last. But 4481 voters in the Kettering School Board race voted for me. I figure I got about 30% of those voters who voted for school board candidates. 30% sounds a lot better than the 14% reported yesterday.

Yesterday I reported these results from the Kettering School Board election that show what percentage of votes cast that each candidate received. These percentage numbers are deceptively low.

JULIE ANN GILMORE 8858 votes or 27.31%
GEORGE H. BAYLESS 7577 votes or 23.36%
JIM BROWN 5811 votes or 17.92%
FRANK C. MAUS 5706 votes or 17.59%
MIKE BOCK 4481 votes or 13.82%

Julie and George have a much more solid mandate than the 27% and 23% that is indicated. I figure it is at least 57% and 48%, respectively.

Each voter was allowed to vote for as many as three candidates. If all 17,822 voters had made three choices, there would have been 53,466 votes cast. As it was only 32,433 votes were cast, so there was an under vote of 21,033 votes. An under vote happened when a voter chose zero candidates (an under vote of 3), one candidate (an under vote of 2), or two candidates (an under vote of 1).

It’s impossible to know how many voters voted for zero board of education candidates — but I think it’s safe to say the number is 10% or more. I’m going with 12% as a conservative estimate. So if 88% of the voters actually chose any school board candidate then the number of school board voters was 15,683.

These percentages are more impressive — and more accurate. They show the percentage of voters, who voted for any board candidate, who chose each candidate.

JULIE ANN GILMORE 8858 votes or 57%
GEORGE H. BAYLESS 7577 votes or 48%
JIM BROWN 5811 votes or 37%
FRANK C. MAUS 5706 votes or 36%
MIKE BOCK 4481 votes or 29%

This adds up to 207% — meaning, according to this calculation, the average voter who voted chose 2 candidates.

So, I think it is fair to say that about 30% of Kettering voters who made a choice for school board, chose me. About 3 out of 10. Not nearly enough to win, but, not bad.

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment