Bob Woodward: “In Iraq, Bush Thinks We Have Done a Magnificent Thing”

Bob Woodward in his interview with Scott Pelley on “60 Minutes” last night, said that George Bush sees the action the U.S. has taken in Iraq as “magnificent” and that Bush is “frustrated with the attitude of the Iraqi people….  He doesn’t understand why Iraq citizens are not more  appreciative.”

Woodward in the interview was promoting his new book, “The War Within”  (An interesting review of the book is “Bob Woodward Writes Self-Adoring New Bush Chronicle.” )  Pelley said the obvious to Woodward, that maybe one reason the Iraqis lack appreciation is because tens of thousands of their friends and family have been killed.  Woodward’s reply was that Bush’s focus, “his beacon,” is on Iraq’s liberation.

Estimates of how many Iraqi’s have been killed vary.  According to the British group, Iraq Body Count, the current number of documented Iraqi civilian deaths is 86,864 – 94,782.   Just Foreign Policy puts the number much higher  — 1,255,026 — and offers an on-going Iraqi civilian death counter that can be added to web-sites.  A British polling firm called Opinion Research Business estimates that the number of Iraqi civilian deaths exceeds 1 million.

Surprisingly, Google shows very few articles that center on the suffering of the civilians of Iraq.  An article in the Guardian says that this lack of reporting is the result of a deliberate U.S. policy to not count civilian deaths and that this policy comes from lessons learned in the Vietnam War:

Lieutenant General Tommy Franks, who led the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan during his time as head of US Central Command, once announced, “We don’t do body counts.” This blunt response to a question about civilian casualties was an attempt to distance George Bush’s wars from the disaster of Vietnam. One of the rituals of that earlier conflict was the daily announcement of how many Vietnamese fighters US forces had killed. It was supposed to convince a sceptical American public that victory was coming. But the “body count” concept sounded callous – and never more so than when it emerged that many of the alleged guerrilla dead were in fact women, children and other unarmed civilians.”

In addtion to many civilian Iraqi deaths that cause Iraqi’s to see this war as less than “magnificient,” are the huge numbers of civilians displaced by the war.  According to Refugee International, one in five Iraqis are refugees:  2.8 million vacated their homes for safer areas in Iraq and 2 million fled the country — to Syria, Jordan, Iran, Egypt, Lebanon, Turkey and Gulf States — and most are living in awful conditions. The number of displaced Iraq citizens is huge for such a small country. If Americans were displaced at the same proportion, 60 million Americans would be displaced.

I found this film, “The Hard Way Home,” by a British filmaker, Paul Eedle,  commissioned by the Arabic service of the BBC:

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

Watch Out Mr. Bush, We’re Coming to Washington To Shake Things Up

Click on picture to enlarge.

Posted in Special Reports | 1 Comment

John McCain Wants To Fight Fight Fight

John McCain, as he concluded his acceptance speech, said, “I fell in love with my country when I was a prisoner in someone else’s. … My country saved me, and I cannot forget it. And I will fight for her for as long as I draw breath, so help me God.”

McCain said, “I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president.” And then, he used the word “fight” seven more times in the last few words of his speech:

Fight with me. Fight with me. Fight for what’s right for our country. Fight for the ideals and character of a free people. Fight for our children’s future. Fight for justice and opportunity for all. Stand up to defend our country from its enemies. Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America. Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight. Nothing is inevitable here. We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history. Thank you, and God bless you.”

McCain, I’m sure, was using the second definition of the word, “fight” — “to put forth a determined effort.” But his risk in using the word “fight” is that it reminds listeners of the first definition: “to contend in battle, to strive to overcome by blows or weapons.

I early predicted that McCain’s emphasis on “fighting” — on using the military — would turn primary voters away from him. In “Why Republicans Eventually Will Reject McCain,” I wrote, “McCain’s comments about Iraq will torpedo his candidacy. McCain says that even at the time — March, 2003 — if he had known that Iraq had no biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons, he still would have advocated and supported a U.S. invasion of Iraq in order to topple Saddam Hussain. This is a pretty amazing position which reveals that McCain, rather than seeing the use of military force as the last possible alternative, sees the use of military force as a reasonable means to advance U.S. policy.”

I’m still amazed that, with his comments about Iraq, McCain got the nomination. McCain is on record that he felt that the way to “fight” Iraq — even if Iraq had no WMD’s — was to invade it, “to contend in battle,” and to “overcome by blows and weapons.” How could anyone with such thinking be elevated to our highest office?

I agree that we need a president who will “fight,” who will, “put forth a determined effort.” But “Fight Fight Fight” hardly seems like a topic McCain would want to emphasize. It is surprising that McCain’s would end his speech by hammering the fight theme. McCain’s eagerness to use the military to “fight” Iraq, in my thinking, disqualifies him to be president. And I’m thinking that a lot of the Republican base, those attracted to Ron Paul, when they think it over, will see that it is exactly because of McCain’s experience — the track record he has laid down — they should not vote for him, even by “holding their nose.” With his record of bellicosity, why in the world would anyone want to give McCain authority over our nuclear codes and our trillion dollar military?

Posted in Features, M Bock, Opinion | 2 Comments