Prime Minister of Israel, Olmert, Says Israel Should Pull Out of West Bank

Israel’s Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, says Israel must leave the West Bank as well as East Jerusalem.   Excerpts from an article from the New York Times:

  • “What I am saying to you now has not been said by any Israeli leader before me,” Mr. Olmert told the newspaper Yediot Aharonot in the interview on the occasion of the Jewish new year, observed from Monday evening till Wednesday evening. “The time has come to say these things.”
  • Olmert said, “Who thinks seriously that if we sit on another hilltop, on another hundred meters, that this is what will make the difference for the State of Israel’s basic security?”
  • Over the last year, Mr. Olmert has publicly castigated himself for his earlier right-wing views and he did so again in this interview. On Jerusalem, for example, he said: “I am the first who wanted to enforce Israeli sovereignty on the entire city. I admit it. I am not trying to justify retroactively what I did for 35 years. For a large portion of these years, I was unwilling to look at reality in all its depth.”
  • He said that maintaining sovereignty over an undivided Jerusalem, Israel’s official policy, would involve bringing 270,000 Palestinians inside Israel’s security barrier. It would mean a continuing risk of terrorist attacks against civilians like those carried out this year by Jerusalem Palestinian residents with front-end loaders.
  • On peace with the Palestinians, Mr. Olmert said in the interview: “We face the need to decide but are not willing to tell ourselves, yes, this is what we have to do. We have to reach an agreement with the Palestinians, the meaning of which is that in practice we will withdraw from almost all the territories, if not all the territories. We will leave a percentage of these territories in our hands, but will have to give the Palestinians a similar percentage, because without that there will be no peace.”
Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

Turner and Kucinich Agreement Shows Victory Of Ideology, Bankruptcy Of Democracy

Why did it happen?  The House of Representatives rejected the strong pleas of both Republican and Democratic leadership and voted “No” on emergency legislation described as crucial to the nation’s well being. Why?

We call the U.S. House the “People’s House.” The design of the Constitution created many more members of the House, compared to the Senate, and required direct election of members of the House at short intervals, every  two years.

The House is the legislative branch that is suppose to be closest to the people.  But gerrymandering has defeated the Constitution’s design, and now 90% of members of the House are in Districts considered “safe.”  These “safe” Districts are both Republican and Democratic and members of these Districts usually can count on easily winning by margins of 65% or better.  Members of these  gerrymandered Districts seldom have serious competition from the opposing party and, therefore, tend to cater to the “base,” the most partisan element of their party.  They are much more ideological in their thinking and much more partisan in their actions, than if they were required to answer to a more evenly balanced electorate.

The bail out legislation offended both the Right and the Left.  Conservative constituencies demanded their representatives vote “No,” echoing talk radio, Lou Dobbs, etc.  Liberal constituencies also demanded a “No” vote, saying that more help be given to “Main Street,” rather than so much help to “Wall Street.”

The 95 Democrats voting “No,” I’m sure, were mostly considered “Liberals,” while the 133 Republicans voting “No,” were mostly “Conservatives.”  In Ohio Democrat Dennis Kucinich voted “No,” and Republican Mike Turner also voted “No.”  Kucinich will defend his “No” vote based on Liberal principles, and Turner will defend his “No” based on his Conservative principles.  And in their gerrymandered districts, probably neither Representative in the “People’s House” will need to really account for their vote in any in-depth way.

Kucinich and Turner found agreement to vote “No” by putting ideology above practicality.  And in the wake of their vote, over $1.2 Trillion of wealth of stock market value vaporized.

The “People’s House,” should be all about making hard choices for the people’s good.  The fact that Kucinich and Turner agreed in voting “No” is disturbing.  Their unanimity demonstrates the triumph of ideology and partisanship over sound reasoning.  It demonstrates the bankrupt state of our democracy.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | 6 Comments

Mike Turner Votes “No” On Bailout ; Boehner Blames Pelosi For Bill’s Defeat

Mike Turner joined 132 other Republican Representatives today and voted “No” on approving the $700 Billion Bailout.  The bill failed by a vote of 205 Yes to 228 No.  Altogether, 65 Republicans voted “Yes,” and 133 Republicans voted “No,” while 140 Democrats voted “Yes” and 95 Democrats voted “No.”

John Boehner, House Republican Leader, blamed Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the defeat of the bill saying that her speech was so partisan that it caused some Republican congressman, who otherwise would have supported the vote, to vote “No.”

This is what Pelosi said in her speech:  “It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush Administration’s failed economic policies — policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system.”

Here is how Ohio’s Representatives voted (from Slate):

Steve Chabot (R) No Ohio – 1 Lean Rep.
Jean Schmidt (R) No Ohio – 2 Lean Rep.
Michael Turner (R) No Ohio – 3 Safe Rep.
Jim Jordan (R) No Ohio – 4 Safe Rep.
Robert Latta (R) No Ohio – 5 Safe Rep.
Charles Wilson (D) Yes Ohio – 6 Safe Dem.
David Hobson (R) Yes Ohio – 7 Rep. Favored*
John Boehner (R) Yes Ohio – 8 Safe Rep.
Marcy Kaptur (D) No Ohio – 9 Safe Dem.
Dennis Kucinich (D) No Ohio – 10 Safe Dem.
Pat Tiberi (R) No Ohio – 12 Safe Rep.
Betty Sutton (D) No Ohio – 13 Safe Dem.
Steven LaTourette (R) No Ohio – 14 Rep. Favored
Deborah Pryce (R) Yes Ohio – 15 Tossup*
Ralph Regula (R) Yes Ohio – 16 Tossup*
Tim Ryan (D) Yes Ohio – 17 Safe Dem.
Zachary Space (D) Yes Ohio – 18
Posted in Special Reports | 2 Comments