The $700 Billion Bailout Should Be A Powerful Teaching Opportunity For Presidential Candidates

I’ve been thinking what a powerful teaching opportunity this $700 Billion bail out presents to us — it should be a big motivation to explore the truth of our whole economic system.  Exploring truth, of course is dangerous in a political setting, and this great teaching moment may be a lost opportunity.

I’ve been thinking about making a short video, based on the 80’s movie, “My dinner with André” : two people engaged in a philosophical conversation, at a fancy restaurant, where the concept of truth is explored.  In my version, my video would be set in my dahlia garden.  Truth, beauty, mortality, drama — dahlias have it all.

I would include in my dahlia script, for example, an article I found recently written by an Oxford professor, that speculates that there is a possibility that the basic Matrix movie premise is correct — we are, in fact, living in a computer simulation.

In the original Matrix movie, the main character, Nemo, is asked, “How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?” Good question.  How much truth can we handle?

We all were taken down the rabbit hole this week when, suddenly, the ground under us was magically removed as our lame duck president demanded $750 Billion — Immediately. Now. Or else.  Huh?

Secretary of the Treasury Paulson was asked what happens if this massive amount of money doesn’t work.  He said, “It has to work.” Very reassuring.

The idea that reality, as we know it, is a sham, suddenly seems debatable. It is no wonder people go crazy. Sometimes, even for those of us deemed sane, everything seems a conspiracy, a lie wrapped within an untruth, enveloped in a spin. Does anyone, for example, really believe whatever it is that George W. Bush reads off of his TelePrompTer?

The $700 Billion demand is astonishing.  What an opportunity. It is almost as if the stars are aligning.  Our nation has the potential of a powerful teaching moment, one that intersects with a presidential election.  This election should be all about telling the truth.  But it seems far from concentrating on that great task.

Dahlias make me philosophical, in part, I guess, because in Dayton, the first frost date is October 10. Dahlias are late bloomers. Here it is, almost October, and still I have some large plants that have not yet bloomed.  I’m getting worried.

This election should be a watershed moment in the vitalization of our democracy, and in the growth of a more prosperous and more just economy.  A dahlia has a short time to reveal itself, a short time to get it right.  So do we.  We should all be worried.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Leave a comment

Let’s Promote Web-Based Debate By Local Candidates Using “Bloggingsheads” TV Format

Looking through the New York Times on-line this morning, I discovered “Bloggingheads”: a library of videos featuring a split screen discussion between two people. The feature is not unique to the NYT, but comes from a Blogginghead’s web-site.

I’m thinking that this general format could be used in political campaigns. I’d like to see candidates for political office engage each other in web-based discussions.  In fact, I think it would be great, if we could Bring Back Lincoln Douglas Style Debates To Today’s Campaigns using this technology.

I want to investigate how DaytonOS might organize on-line debates for local candidates in this election — candidates for the State Assembly, County Sheriff, County Commission, and U.S. Congress. Posting a debate on-line would give the opportunity for extended dialogue between the debate participants and viewers.

Here is what Wikipedia says:  “Bloggingheads.tv is a political, world events, philosophy, and science video blog discussion site in which the participants take part in an active back and forth conversation via webcam which is then broadcast online to viewers. The site was started by the journalist Robert Wright (The Moral Animal) and the blogger and former journalist Mickey Kaus on November 1, 2005.[1] (Kaus has since dropped out of operational duties of the site as he didn’t want his frequent linking to be seen as a conflict of interest.[2]) Most of the earlier discussions posted to the site involved one or both of those individuals, but since has grown to include a total of more than 150 other individual contributors, mostly journalists, scientists, authors, well known political bloggers, and other notable individuals.

“Unregistered users are able to view all of the videos which are contained on the site, while free registration is required to comment on the individual discussions, or participate in the forums.”

Robert Wright, left, of Bloggingheads.tv and Daniel Gross of Newsweek debate whether homebuyers can be protected from their own bad judgment.

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

Bill Maher Says Too Many People Don’t Look At End Of The World As A Bad Thing

The New York Times today quoted Bill Maher about his new movie, “Religulous,” due to start on October 3.  Maher says,   “I truly believe that unless we shed this skin, mankind is playing with real fire here.  Because there’s nuclear weapons in the world and because there are suicide bombers and there are so many people who are anxious to get to that next world. They don’t look at the end of the world as a bad thing. That’s pretty scary. Until rationality is enshrined again and this magical thinking is marginalized, I’m a little nervous.”

The Times review summary describes “Religulous” like this: “Borat director Larry Charles follows host Bill Maher as he travels the continents interviewing various subjects about God and religion.”

After its premiere at the recent Toronto International Film Festival, Variety critic Robert Koehler wrote: “To the film’s credit, Maher never engages in Michael Moore-style gotcha tactics, but rather asks questions that raise more questions, in the form of a Socratic dialogue. To believers expecting a blind hatchet job, this will prove both thought-provoking and a bit disarming.”

Posted in Special Reports | 4 Comments