Media Matters Urges Its Readers To Protest NBC’s Planned Ann Coulter Broadcast

Media Matters is urging its readers to contact NBC and protest the network’s plans to feature Ann Coulter and allow her to promote her new book on national television. The following is the Media Matters letter:

Dear Friend,
As you know, Ann Coulter has a long history of making controversial statements. In media appearances and her syndicated column, Coulter has likened President-elect Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler repeatedly, called Al Gore a “total fag,” and written that without affirmative action, African-American Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) couldn’t get a job “that didn’t involve wearing a paper hat.” She has also repeatedly discussed potential acts of violence against people she doesn’t like or with whom she disagrees, including saying of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: “We need somebody to put rat poison in Justice Stevens’ crème brulee.”

» Call NBC and ask why they are reportedly again helping Coulter promote her latest book despite past condemnations by NBC staff for her history of reprehensible comments.
Despite this long and well-documented history of controversial statements, NBC has once again reportedly invited Coulter to promote her latest book on its airwaves. On Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes, during a segment in which she called Obama an “atheist” and asked if “we could get all of his aliases before he’s sworn in on the Quran,” Coulter announced that she is scheduled to appear on the January 6, 2009, broadcast of NBC’s Today.

Enough is enough. Even NBC-affiliated hosts and anchors have expressed disgust over some of Coulter’s more offensive rhetoric. Today co-host Meredith Vieira has acknowledged that the media are part of the problem, saying “we’re perpetuating it.”

» Call NBC and ask why they are reportedly again helping Coulter promote her latest book despite past condemnations by NBC staff for her history of reprehensible comments.
It is time to hold NBC accountable. In light of both her history and the numerous condemnations of her by NBC staff, the network should reconsider reportedly providing her with a platform from which to make these comments.

Call NBC today and let them know what you think.
Thank you for your continued support.

Eric Burns
President
Media Matters for America

Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

A 21st Century Understanding: The Christmas Story Tells That In Every Baby The Human Race Can Start Anew

The Christmas story is a story about a supernatural event, a miracle — God, Himself, bursting into history. Angels, God’s messengers, supernatural beings, announce a new reality — a reality beyond nature and beyond human understanding — God, Himself, has come to earth in human form as a baby.

The Christmas story proclaims that God, a being outside of nature, intervenes in human history to save mankind and to exercise His authority on planet earth.

Suddenly, the glory of the Lord shone all about them.

Suddenly, the glory of the Lord shone all about them.

But, the idea that a force outside of nature, God, can burst into history at any moment has a dark side. Apocalyptic thinking relies on such a view of God, and such thinking often leads to deadly results. According to an article in New York Times, “Waiting for Armageddon,” 50 million Americans believe that these are the “last days” and that, once again, as at that first Christmas, God will intervene in history: Christ will suddenly appear in the sky, in glory, and history will be forever changed.

These “last days,” according to these believers, may involve mass deaths, nuclear annihilation, incredible wars and destruction — but, in the end, God will intervene and everything will be OK. Such irresponsible and irrational thinking almost glories in anticipation of the negative; such thinking hampers motivation to do the hard work needed to create a positive future — the hard work needed to build a more just, a more safe, a more wonderful world.

Such irrational thinking begins with a literal belief in the Christmas story — with a belief that a force outside of history, outside of nature, burst into reality some 2000 years ago — and projects that story of the supernatural to a scenario where supernatural intervention saves mankind from the annihilation of the “end times.” This is a very dangerous way to think.

Certainly irrational thinking, religious radicalism, is a huge threat to the survival of future generations, to the survival of the earth itself. Thoughtful Christians need to find an understanding of their Christian faith that is worthy of a 21st Century understanding, one that does not promote irrational thinking and religious radicalism. Finding a way to understand the Christmas story is a good start. There needs to be an understanding grounded in an appreciation for awe inspiring mystery, but also grounded in a reality worthy of a 21st Century understanding.

A 21st Century understanding of the Christmas story, it seems to me, should inspire us to contemplate that human life itself is mysterious, beyond our understanding, and perhaps, even beyond our capacity to understand. A 21st contemplation of the story of Christmas must deal with the concept of human destiny. The Christmas story is the story of the birth of a baby, a baby who grew into his potential. We don’t need choirs of angels to know that every baby has a great potential beyond our comprehension — a potential to do good, a potential to help raise humanity to new heights of compassion, justice, truth and love. The Christmas story is a story of great hope; it says that in every baby the human race can start anew.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Senate Report: Torture Started With Bush Denying That Geneva Convention Applies To al-Quaida And Taliban

A Senate Report, the result of a two year study, says that President Bush got the torture ball rolling on Feb, 7, 2002, with his memorandum stating that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to al-Qaida or the Taliban.

The report says that after this memorandum, “Senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive (interrogation) techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees.”

Excerpts from an article in Salon by Mark Benjamin:

  • On Thursday, as the incoming Obama administration is mulling whether or not it even should investigate torture under the Bush administration, the Senate Armed Services Committee released the executive summary of its own investigation of the treatment of U.S. detainees. (The full report is still being declassified.)
  • In the spring of 2002 former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice asked then-CIA Director George Tenet to brief members of the National Security Council on the harsh interrogation program under development by the CIA, a program that has utilized waterboarding. Meetings ensued. “Members of the president’s cabinet and other senior officials attended meetings at the White House where specific interrogation techniques were discussed,” the report states. Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was there.
  • Rice also asked former Attorney General John Ashcroft to provide his stamp of approval, and he did. On Aug. 1, 2002, … after input from former White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and former counsel to the Vice President David Addington.
  • The CIA … spirited prisoners off the streets of Pakistan and into its network of secret prisons, or “black sites,” for interrogation. On Dec. 2, 2002, Rumsfeld joined the party, issuing a memo authorizing the use of tough techniques for detainees in military custody at Guantánamo, including stress positions, forced nudity, use of dogs and sensory deprivation. Legal memos from all three military branches had previously warned that the tactics might be illegal, but the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, put the kibosh on any further study.
Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | 3 Comments