Robert Fisk On Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Gaza — Not The Elephant In The Room — The Pile Of Corpses In The Room

I’ve recently discovered Robert Fisk, reporter for the UK Independent. In his most recent column Fisk says, “For the people of the Middle East, the absence of the word ‘Gaza’ – indeed, the word ‘Israel’ as well – was the dark shadow over Obama’s inaugural address.

Excerpts:

  • For the people of the Middle East, the absence of the word “Gaza” – indeed, the word “Israel” as well – was the dark shadow over Obama’s inaugural address. Didn’t he care? Was he frightened? Did Obama’s young speech-writer not realise that talking about black rights – why a black man’s father might not have been served in a restaurant 60 years ago – would concentrate Arab minds on the fate of a people who gained the vote only three years ago but were then punished because they voted for the wrong people? It wasn’t a question of the elephant in the china shop. It was the sheer amount of corpses heaped up on the floor of the china shop.
  • The friendly message to Muslims, “a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect”, simply did not address the pictures of the Gaza bloodbath at which the world has been staring in outrage.
  • Even the Palestinians in Damascus spotted the absence of those two words: Palestine and Israel. So hot to touch they were, and on a freezing Washington day, Obama wasn’t even wearing gloves.

In a previous column Fisk notes: Wherever I go, I hear the same tired Middle East comparisons

Robert Fisk -- photo from Wikipedia

Robert Fisk -- photo from Wikipedia

Excerpts:

  • I ended the week in one of those BBC World Service discussions in which a guy from The Jerusalem Post, a man from al-Jazeera, a British academic and Fisk danced the usual steps around the catastrophe in Gaza. The moment I mentioned that 600 Palestinian dead for 20 Israeli dead around Gaza in 10 years was grotesque, pro-Israeli listeners condemned me for suggesting (which I did not) that only 20 Israelis had been killed in all of Israel in 10 years. Of course, hundreds of Israelis outside Gaza have died in that time – but so have thousands of Palestinians.
  • My favourite moment came when I pointed out that journalists should be on the side of those who suffer. If we were reporting the 18th-century slave trade, I said, we wouldn’t give equal time to the slave ship captain in our dispatches. If we were reporting the liberation of a Nazi concentration camp, we wouldn’t give equal time to the SS spokesman. At which point a journalist from the Jewish Telegraph in Prague responded that “the IDF are not Hitler”. Of course not. But who said they were?

I looked up Fisk in Wikipedia. It says:

Robert Fisk (born 12 July 1946 in Maidstone, Kent) is an English journalist and author. He is the Middle East correspondent of the UK newspaper The Independent, has spent more than 30 years living in and reporting from the region, and won awards for his work. [1]

Fisk has been described in the New York Times as “probably the most famous foreign correspondent in Britain.” [2] He covered the Northern Ireland Troubles in the 1970s, the Portuguese Revolution in 1974, the 1975-1990 Lebanese Civil War, the 1979 Iranian revolution, the Soviet war in Afghanistan, the 1980-88 Iran–Iraq War, the 1991 Gulf War, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He has received numerous awards, including the British Press Awards’ International Journalist of the Year award seven times. Fisk speaks vernacular Arabic, and is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden – three times between 1994 and 1997.[3] [4]

Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , | Leave a comment

James K. Galbraith Says Social Security Payments Must Be Increased, Not Decreased

On The Real News Network, I just found a recent interview with economist James K. Galbraith. This whole economics puzzle is something I would like to understand better. Galbraith blames our dismal situation on the deregulation of banks and other financial institutions. I wonder if former true believers in the notion that “government is the problem” ever connect the dots and see that what is happening in our economy is a direct consequence of a rush to fulfill their free market, no regulation, ideas?

In these videos, Galbraith makes a strong case that social security payments should be increased, not decreased. I’m going to take some notes and improve this post with some excerpts.

This is Galbraith’s bio shown on Real News:
James K. Galbraith teaches economics at the University of Texas where he is a Senior Scholar of the Levy Economics Institute and the Chair of the Board of Economists for Peace and Security. The son of renowned economist, the late, John Kenneth Galbraith, he writes a column called “Econoclast” for Mother Jones, and occasional commentary in many other publications, including The Texas Observer, The American Prospect, and The Nation. He is an occasional commentator for Public Radio International’s Marketplace.He directs the University of Texas Inequality Project, an informal research group based at the LBJ School.


Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Gazan Tragedy: “Tell Me Sir, What Do You Do When A Rocket Is Fired At You?”

The Washington Post reports that Israel pulled out of Gaza early Wednesday: “About 1,300 Palestinians were killed and the operation caused an estimated $2 billion in property damage to the already impoverished territory. Thirteen Israelis died during the offensive.”

Tom Dispatch writes:  More than 1,400 dead Gazans (and rising as bodies are dug out of the rubble); 5,500 wounded; hundreds of children killed; 4,000 to 5,000 homes destroyed and 20,000 damaged — 14% of all buildings in Gaza; 50,000 or more homeless; 400,000 without water; 50 U.N. facilities, 21 medical facilities, 1,500 factories and workshops, and 20 mosques reportedly damaged or destroyed; the smashed schools and university structures; the obliterated government buildings; the estimated almost two billion dollars in damage; all taking place on a blockaded strip of land 25 miles long and 4 to 7.5 miles wide that is home to a staggering 1.4 million people.”

What a mess.  No wonder Israel is so hated throughout the world.

In Bill Moyers’ judgment, Israel’s actions amount to “state terrorism.”  In this post, I include powerful commentary by Moyers captured on You Tube.  A person identified as “J Quinn” responded, “Tell me sir, what do you do when a rocket is fired at you?”

J Quinn’s premise, in his or her question, is that the Gazan War was all about Hamas firing rockets into Israel.  But that premise, I believe, is wrong. Quinn’s question inspired me to review what I’ve already posted over the last several weeks about the Gazan War.  My general conclusion is that the Gazan War was an unnecessary war and was initiated by Israel because of domestic politics.  I feel that Israel deliberately used harsh, unreasonable and illegal tactics and that the US should have condemned Israel’s Gazan actions.

What follows is a review of some of my recent posts that brought me to these conclusions.

Pat Buchanan is not known for liberal, mush headed ideas.  In this post, I reported, “Buchanan says that Gaza is like a concentration camp and that Hamas’ little rockets for six months didn’t kill anyone while Israel is now causing massive destruction and suffering.  Buchanan also accuses Israel of using US tax dollars to build illegal settlements on the West Bank.

What has amazed me is how people who should know better contribute to general misinformation about Gaza.  In this article, Report On Gazan War — ABC News With George Stephanopoulos — Was A Shameful Disgrace,  I report on an interview on that program with Shimon Peres and how two US senators, Dick Durbin and Mitch McConnell, disgraced themselves by going overboard in their total agreement with Peres.  McConnell made this outrageous propaganda statement, in line with J Quinn’s question:  “Imagine in this country if somebody from a neighboring country were lobbing shells at our population. We’d do exactly the same thing. I think the Israelis are doing the only thing they can possibly do to defend their population.”

It seems incredible that a US senator would suggest that the US would do the same as Israel has done.  It seems incredible that a US senator would excuse Israel’s use of phosphorous, its bombing of homes, schools and mosques, its targeting leaders for assassination, its massive “collateral damage” killing more than 400 children.  And it seems incredible that a US senator would suggest that Gaza is simply another country boardering Israel, ignoring Israel’s responsibility in creating the situation there.

In this post I report on an article by Marjorie Cohn, “Israel’s Collective Punishment of Gaza.”  Cohn says the Gazan War is all about Israel’s coming elections.  She writes: “Israel’s airstrikes and ground assault on the people of Gaza have little to do with the Gazan rockets, which hadn’t killed any Israelis for a year before Israel’s current military operation. Israel’s leaders are bombing and attacking Gaza in order to gain an advantage in the upcoming Israeli elections in February.

I have a lot of respect for Jimmy Carter.  In this article I report, Jimmy Carter Says Gazan War Was Not Necessary: Jimmy Carter, writing in the Washington Post, says, that, based on his personal I involvement, ‘the devastating invasion of Gaza by Israel could easily have been avoided.’  Carter blames Israel for breaking a “fragile truce”

I have a lot of respect for Dennis Kucinich.  I posted two articles showing Kucinich’s views on the Gazan War:

In Kucinich Says Israel’s Attack On Gazan Civilians, Using US Made Weapons, Violates US Law, I write,  “Congressman Dennis Kucinich is requesting that Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, investigate whether Israel is in violation of a 1976 law that defines the proper use of US made weapons. Kucinich points out that US made F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters were used in an attack of a U.N. School where over 40 Palestinians, women and children, were killed while seeking shelter.”

And this post, Congressman Kucinich Condemns Israeli Attack On Gaza As Violating Geneva Conventions, shows the letter that Kucinich wrote to the U.N. Secretary General.  Kucinich wrote:  “The attacks on civilians represent collective punishment, which is a violation of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The perpetrators of attacks against Israel must also be brought to justice, but Israel cannot create a war against an entire people in order to attempt to bring to justice the few who are responsible. The Israeli leaders know better  … Civilian populations were attacked, countless innocents killed or injured, infrastructure targeted and destroyed, and civil law enforcement negated. All this was, and is, disproportionate, indiscriminate mass violence in violation of international law. Israel is not exempt from international law and must be held accountable. It is time for the UN to not just call for a cease-fire, but for an inquiry as to Israel’s actions.”

Of course, a lot of politicians disagree with Kucinich.  Evidently, it is considered the smart thing, politically, to do.  But it is difficult to believe that a smart man like Newt Gingich really believes his own words.  I post here that “Newt Gingrich Compares Hamas To Nazis, Suggests There Should Be No Limit To Israel’s Violence In Gaza.” I write,  “Newt Gingich, on George Stephanopoulos’ Sunday program, compared Hamas to the Third Reich, and said that like the Third Reich, Hamas has completely forfeited its right to exist. … To compare Hamas to the Nazi regime is amazing.  But if you are willing to think of Hamas in Nazi terms — a urgent, demonic and horrible threat — certainly it is a small step to conclude that Israel is well justified to rain down unspeakable violence on Gaza.  It is easy to conclude that Israel is justified to kill over 900 fellow humans, including 300 children, entire families; justified to destroy mosques, schools, homes.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged | Leave a comment