Three Actions Bring President Barack Obama’s Credibility And Integrity Into Question

I’ve just visited for the first time The White House Blog, watched the video, and read the transcript of President Obama’s Weekly address in which he gives details of his American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan (ARRP), which, he says is to “immediately jump start job creation as well as long-term economic growth.”

Wow. Maybe ignorance is bliss. But the more I hear about our overall financial situation, the more I become worried. And, I’m worried that as a nation we are not worried enough. It seems likely we are only at the beginning of an era of dangerous economic turmoil. We’ve been pushed out to sea by powerful forces we can’t control.

I heard a good comparison to our current attitude to this economic crisis to the attitude of the Richard Dreyfuss character in Jaws — before he actually saw the shark up close — concerned, but not properly reality based terrified. After he saw the shark, the Dreyfuss character gasped, “We’re going to need a bigger boat.”

We need bold action, and I wonder if the steps Obama outlines in his ARRP, really are bold enough. The crisis we find ourselves has not yet focused our attention. In this economic crisis, I fear, we’ve not really seen the shark, yet. And, I wonder if, when we do, Obama will have the capacity to take the bold actions that might be needed.

Obama finished his address with these words: “If we act as citizens and not partisans and begin again the work of remaking America, then I have faith that we will emerge from this trying time even stronger and more prosperous than we were before.”

I had to laugh out loud when I heard the Republican leader, John Boehner, on Meet the Press say, “Somebody has to be looking out for the taxpayers. And I’m going to tell you what, Republicans are going to be there to look out for American taxpayer.” Considering the Republican record of outrageous profligacy under George W. Bush — spending bushels of money, borrowing oceans of money, sinking the country into $4 trillion more debt — Boehner’s tears for the American taxpayer are a hoot. As a Republican leader who empowered Bush’s every incompetent act, Boehner has no credibility. It’s obvious, he is simply being partisan.

But, Obama, himself, must guard his own credibility, his own integrity. Obama must guard against appearing simply partisan. I count three ways that, just this past week, Obama hurt his credibility.

First of all, as I wrote here, Obama, I fear, made a big error by defending Timothy Geithner’s non payment of taxes as an “innocent mistake.” Certainly, Obama can’t believe that Geithner’s non payment was “innocent.” I’m sorry, such a claim is simply not believable and by asserting something to be true that is totally not believable, Obama makes himself look like he is lacking in integrity.

Second, Obama, I fear, made a big error in his handling of the Gazan War. His comments seemed very unbalanced in favor of Israel. In my judgment, by not fairly acknowledging the reality and truth of Israel’s unnecessary violence, Obama’s comments on Gaza makes him look like he is lacking in integrity.

Third, I fear that Obama made a big error by taking his campaign organization — one that had attracted a lot of Independents and nonvoters — and putting it within the Democratic National Committee as a new group, Organizing for America.

The LA Times reports: “President-elect Barack Obama on Saturday took his first public steps toward transforming his massive grassroots political machinery into an unprecedented national network to help pass his policy agenda. Obama said the new network would be used as a tool to press for policies on major issues, including the healthcare system, the Iraq war and the development of new energy sources….That means the organization, as it grows, will be well-positioned to be used as a vehicle for his reelection campaign, to bolster the campaigns of Obama-friendly Democrats in the 2010 midterm elections, and to pressure those in his party who do not agree with him. (E-mails were sent to) 13 million supporters.”

Wow. That sound pretty partisan to me. Yet, on the White House blog, in trying to gain support for his American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan, Obama emphasizes that we should “act as citizens and not partisans.”

Obama’s basic instincts, expressed in the campaign, I feel, are correct: The way forward must be through a vitalization of our democracy, through invigorated citizenship, not one-sided partisanship. This president, as time goes on, will, no doubt, have hard truths to tell us.  His integrity and credibility must be beyond question.  Obama needs to surround himself with people who will push him to the highest levels of integrity, where partisanship is transcended.

We need a bigger boat.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Robert Fisk On Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Gaza — Not The Elephant In The Room — The Pile Of Corpses In The Room

I’ve recently discovered Robert Fisk, reporter for the UK Independent. In his most recent column Fisk says, “For the people of the Middle East, the absence of the word ‘Gaza’ – indeed, the word ‘Israel’ as well – was the dark shadow over Obama’s inaugural address.

Excerpts:

  • For the people of the Middle East, the absence of the word “Gaza” – indeed, the word “Israel” as well – was the dark shadow over Obama’s inaugural address. Didn’t he care? Was he frightened? Did Obama’s young speech-writer not realise that talking about black rights – why a black man’s father might not have been served in a restaurant 60 years ago – would concentrate Arab minds on the fate of a people who gained the vote only three years ago but were then punished because they voted for the wrong people? It wasn’t a question of the elephant in the china shop. It was the sheer amount of corpses heaped up on the floor of the china shop.
  • The friendly message to Muslims, “a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect”, simply did not address the pictures of the Gaza bloodbath at which the world has been staring in outrage.
  • Even the Palestinians in Damascus spotted the absence of those two words: Palestine and Israel. So hot to touch they were, and on a freezing Washington day, Obama wasn’t even wearing gloves.

In a previous column Fisk notes: Wherever I go, I hear the same tired Middle East comparisons

Robert Fisk -- photo from Wikipedia

Robert Fisk -- photo from Wikipedia

Excerpts:

  • I ended the week in one of those BBC World Service discussions in which a guy from The Jerusalem Post, a man from al-Jazeera, a British academic and Fisk danced the usual steps around the catastrophe in Gaza. The moment I mentioned that 600 Palestinian dead for 20 Israeli dead around Gaza in 10 years was grotesque, pro-Israeli listeners condemned me for suggesting (which I did not) that only 20 Israelis had been killed in all of Israel in 10 years. Of course, hundreds of Israelis outside Gaza have died in that time – but so have thousands of Palestinians.
  • My favourite moment came when I pointed out that journalists should be on the side of those who suffer. If we were reporting the 18th-century slave trade, I said, we wouldn’t give equal time to the slave ship captain in our dispatches. If we were reporting the liberation of a Nazi concentration camp, we wouldn’t give equal time to the SS spokesman. At which point a journalist from the Jewish Telegraph in Prague responded that “the IDF are not Hitler”. Of course not. But who said they were?

I looked up Fisk in Wikipedia. It says:

Robert Fisk (born 12 July 1946 in Maidstone, Kent) is an English journalist and author. He is the Middle East correspondent of the UK newspaper The Independent, has spent more than 30 years living in and reporting from the region, and won awards for his work. [1]

Fisk has been described in the New York Times as “probably the most famous foreign correspondent in Britain.” [2] He covered the Northern Ireland Troubles in the 1970s, the Portuguese Revolution in 1974, the 1975-1990 Lebanese Civil War, the 1979 Iranian revolution, the Soviet war in Afghanistan, the 1980-88 Iran–Iraq War, the 1991 Gulf War, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He has received numerous awards, including the British Press Awards’ International Journalist of the Year award seven times. Fisk speaks vernacular Arabic, and is one of the few Western journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden – three times between 1994 and 1997.[3] [4]

Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , | Leave a comment

James K. Galbraith Says Social Security Payments Must Be Increased, Not Decreased

On The Real News Network, I just found a recent interview with economist James K. Galbraith. This whole economics puzzle is something I would like to understand better. Galbraith blames our dismal situation on the deregulation of banks and other financial institutions. I wonder if former true believers in the notion that “government is the problem” ever connect the dots and see that what is happening in our economy is a direct consequence of a rush to fulfill their free market, no regulation, ideas?

In these videos, Galbraith makes a strong case that social security payments should be increased, not decreased. I’m going to take some notes and improve this post with some excerpts.

This is Galbraith’s bio shown on Real News:
James K. Galbraith teaches economics at the University of Texas where he is a Senior Scholar of the Levy Economics Institute and the Chair of the Board of Economists for Peace and Security. The son of renowned economist, the late, John Kenneth Galbraith, he writes a column called “Econoclast” for Mother Jones, and occasional commentary in many other publications, including The Texas Observer, The American Prospect, and The Nation. He is an occasional commentator for Public Radio International’s Marketplace.He directs the University of Texas Inequality Project, an informal research group based at the LBJ School.


Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | 1 Comment