Paul Krugman: “Boehner’s Idea of Economics Is Completely Insane”

Economist Paul Krugman in a recent blog writes about Dayton congressman, John Boehner: “Boehner’s idea of economics is completely insane.”

Krugman absolutely disagrees with Boehner’s thinking and seems to be in honest despair that a congressional leader with a lot of influence could actually advocate Boehner’s view.  Krugman asks, “Can this country be saved?”

Krugman strongly disagrees with Boehner’s hard stance on government spending. Boehner keeps repeating this theme: “It’s time for government to tighten their belts and show the American people that we ‘get’ it.”

Krugman writes, “He (Boehner) is talking about the current economic crisis as if it were a harvest failure — as if we faced a shortage of goods, so that the more you consume the less is left for me. In reality — even most conservatives understand this, when they think about it — we’re in a world desperately short of demand. If you consume more, that’s GOOD for me, because it helps create jobs and raise incomes. It’s in my personal disinterest to have you tighten your belt — and that’s just as true if you’re ‘the government’ as if you’re my neighbor.”

Posted in Special Reports | 13 Comments

Montgomery County Democrats Recommend To Senate Caucus That Fred Strahorn Replace Tom Roberts

I just returned from a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Montgomery County Democratic Party.  About 20 people were in attendance.  The committee voted to recommend Fred Strahorn to replace Tom Roberts as senator for the 5th District.  Roberts recently resigned from the Ohio Senate in order to accept an appointment from Governor Strickland to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.

Roberts’ replacement eventually will be determined by a vote of the Democratic Senate Caucus, which consists of 11 Democratic senators.  The Chair of the Montgomery County Democratic Party, Mark Owens, was requested by the Caucus to submit up to three names of candidates to be considered for the replacement.  Mark, in turn, called a special meeting of the Executive Committee to receive its input.

The Committee heard short presentations by both Strahorn and by Victor Harris.  Both individuals are impressive individuals and both made good presentations.  The Committee, predictably, strongly favored Strahorn.  Eventually a motion was made and seconded that the committee recommend Strahorn.

I made the point that, because Senator Roberts has strongly recommended Strahorn, it is is a safe bet that Strahorn will get the appointment, and that recommending Vic Harris in addition to Strahorn would certainly not change that fact.

I suggested an amendment to the motion.  My thought was that the Montgomery County Democratic Executive Committee should use the opportunity to recommend up to three candidates to include Vic in the recommendation and, by doing, give Vic some encouragement.  Vic, I feel, has the capacity for a great political career, and more importantly, the capacity to establish a new quality of Democratic leadership.  I moved that the motion be amended to not only recommend Strahorn, but also to recommend Vic Harris.  My motion died for lack of a second.  Wow.  That lack of a second makes you feel unpopular. The will of the group was that only one person should be recommended — Strahorn.

The discussion brought out the fact that the group wanted to make certain that their message to the Democratic Senate Caucus was not diluted.  The message:  Fred Strahorn is are only candidate recommended by the Montgomery County Democratic Party.

I was surprised that the discussion revealed lingering anger at Vic for defying the Party last year and seeking to become the Democratic Party’s candidate for the 40th Ohio House District.  ( For some history, see the article I wrote one year ago:  Victor Harris: Surprised That Local Democratic Party Wanted To Suppress Primary Competition.)

The Party endorsed and supported Roland Winburn in the primary last year.  The fact that Vic ran against this endorsed candidate, evidently, is still point of irritation to some members of the Executive Committee.  Vic organized a great campaign, but was not able to overcome the force of the party establishment that printed handbills showing that Roland was the officially endorsed candidate of the Montgomery County Democratic Party.  It is no wonder that uninformed 40th District Democrats listened to their Party’s endorsement.  Roland won by 56% to 44%.

I wrote an article last week that cited a DDN editorial criticizing the anti-democratic process whereby only a handful of politicians will decide who should replace Roberts —  “Ohio Senate rises above democracy.” Today’s action by Montgomery County Democrats, that constricts recommendation to the Ohio Democratic Senate Caucus to just one choice,  makes the process criticized by the DDN become even more closed, even more anti-democratic.

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

Our Society Needs To “Put Aside Childish Things”

Great article, “The Little Mr. Conservative,” in the NYT about Jonathan Krohn, the 14 year old who spoke at the CPAC convention. This article says that  Johnathan is a home schooler who, in his short life, has listened to a lot of talk radio. He was early on hooked by Bill Bennett. For years, Jonathan has been regularly getting up at 6:00 AM to listen to Bennett on the radio.

Johnathan has published a book, “Define Conservatism,” that argues that conservatism is based on four principles: 1) Respect for the Constitution, 2) Respect for Life, 3) Less Government, and 4) Personal Responsibility. He writes, “Dear readers, I hope that each of you will individually learn from this book. It is my personal sentiment that America needs another Conservative revolution, and it is my prayer that that movement will begin with each of you.”

Wow. That is pretty strong advice coming from a 14 year old. It is no surprise to learn that Johnathan has a theatrical background . According to this article, Krohn has been performing on stage since he was eight, and, Inside Edition’s Debora Norville named him “Atlanta’s Most Talented Child” in 2006.

His speech at CPAC was impressive. He spoke with great poise, with good humor and conviction. He just seems like a great kid.

I looked Johnathan up on You-tube and found this brief interview in which Jonathan gives his view of what government should be. He says, “Government is about the people and protecting the people and the people’s rights as set forth in the constitution and not about helping the people. That’s never been government’s job. That’s a romanticized view of government and that is a major problem with government.”

When Johnathan says that America needs a “Conservative revolution,” I wonder what he might envisage that to be? But, more importantly, I wonder what Johnathan might have to say about all of this when he matures — maybe, in another twenty or thirty years — if, over the years, he maintains his passion for learning, his passion for ideas. Who knows? Maybe, in time, Johnathan will become a liberal.

St. Paul said that when he became a man, he put away childish things. He said that when he was a child he thought as a child. I’m sure Johnathan Krohn is doing everything in his power to think like a man and not think as a child. He is sitting at the feet of teachers like Bill Bennett and other radio personalities who serve as his models. Like all children, his is an absorbent mind. His CPAC listeners would probably disagree that Krohn’s thoughts are childish.  But it is probably a good bet that eventually Krohn will look back on his thinking at this time in his life and make that very conclusion.  Krohn’s idea of what constitutes mature thinking may be very different in a few years. But maybe not.

It is interesting that Barack Obama, in his Inaugural Speech, echoed St. Paul’s call to maturity and said, that among the childish things our society should discard should be “worn-out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.”

A young thinker like Krohn can declare a dogma with great certainty that “government is not about helping people, that’s not government’s job,” and make such a declaration as a statement of principle. Based upon what he has read or heard, Krohn, no doubt, believes that his declaration about the proper role of government is reflective of mature and principled thought. He’s repeating, of course, what he’s heard someone else say. But, don’t we all do that?

When Paul wrote, “When I was a child I thought as a child. When I became a man I put away childish things,” he signaled that maturity brings with it a transformation of one’s thought;  with maturity comes independent thinking.

It seems if we are to find the transformative solutions needed for our future, our whole society will need to rise to new levels of mature thinking.  Unfortunately one doesn’t stop being a child simply because one has accumulated a lot of birthdays.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Leave a comment