Reich: On Coming Health Care Reform Debate, Obama Must “Twist Arms, Cajole, Force” Congress Members

Robert Reich says that the coming congressional debate on health care promises to be fierce and that President Obama must give strong leadership. “In order to get anything meaningful through this session of Congress,” Reich syas, “the President will have to give congressional Democrats far more leadership and more cover.”

Reich says Obama will, “need to twist arms, cajole, force recalcitrant members to join him, threaten retribution if they don’t come along,” and must stand firm and communicate these three principles:

  1. I will not stand for a bill that leaves millions of Americans without health care. It’s vitally important to cover all Americans, not only for their and their childrens’ sakes and not only because it’s a moral imperitive, but because doing so will be good for all of us.
  2. The only way to cover all Americans without causing deficits to rise is to require that the wealthiest Americans pay a bit extra. The wealthy can afford to make sure all Americans are healthy. The top 1 percent of earners now take home 23 percent of total national income, the highest percentage since 1928. Their tax burden is not excessive. Even as income and wealth have become more concentrated than at any time in the past 80 years, those at the top are now taxed at lower rates than rich Americans have been taxed since before the start of World War II.
  3. Finally, I want a true public insurance option — not a “cooperative,” and not something that’s triggered if certain goals aren’t met. A public option is critical for lowering health-care costs. Today, private insurers don’t face enough competition to guarantee low prices and high service. In 36 states, three or fewer insurers account for 65 percent of the insurance market. A public insurance option would also have the scale and authority needed to negotiate low drug prices and low prices from medical providers.
Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

“What Is The Purpose, The Aim Of Public Education?” — Every School Board Candidate Should Answer

In on-going commentary, Dan and Duane have identified themselves as “New Earth” creationists, who believe the earth is 6000 old.  I called this view an anti-science, astonishing, view to hold in 2009.  Eric asks, “Do Dan and Duane’s kids need to be fixed by public schools?”, and says, “This is an important issue for a school board candidate.”

My response:

According to the principle of local control, a big responsibility of school board members is to set local school policy.  In order to set policy,  every school board member should have an answer to the question:  “What Is The Purpose, The Aim Of Public Education?”

In the example that Eric gives, of a school board pressed to deal with the concerns of “New Earth” parents, I feel, in this matter as in other school matters, policy should flow from a clear understanding of the aim of the system.  In answer to Eric’s question, if Dan and Duane were living in Kettering and, if I was pressed as a board member to make “New Earth” policy, my point of view would be that the belief that the earth is 6000 years old is a religious belief.

If Dan and Duane want their children to be indoctrinated into their belief that the earth is 6000 years old, as a board member, I would resist any proposal that would use taxpayer money to finance such an indoctrination.  It is not the aim of public education to promote a specific religion, or a specific religious belief.

I wouldn’t need to have a complete understanding of aim to rule on the Dan and Duane issue — I would just need to know what the aim is not.  But a good understanding of aim / purpose is crucial in order to make valid planning about the future.  It is impossible to make good judgments about the future without a guiding aim / purpose with which to evaluate those judgments.  The aim for public education has become lost in the blizzard of state tests that has confused the whole question of school purpose.  I write about it in this post:   A Great Question: How Can We Tell If a School Is Excellent?

Aim should guide any system — establishing aim / purpose, of course, is a  W. Edward Deming principle — and aim should come first.  Deming said, “Without an aim, there is no system.” (I can’t imagine a definition of an aim for public education that could justify taxpayer’s money used to accommodate a parent’s view that the earth is 6000 years old.)

The children of Dan and Duane, and all children, in my view, if they attend Kettering Schools, because of their education, hopefully, should gain the skills and experience needed to grow into their potential and gain the skills and practice needed to become thoughtful, active citizens.  Our system of public education should be producing leaders, independent thinkers.  This should be an aim of the system.  It should be producing individuals well grounded in contemporary science, well practiced in the use of democracy, and well prepared with understanding of their world — prepared and inclined to be effective and contributing citizens in a democratic society.

Defining quality, defining aim, is the first step to transforming public education, and defining quality is a community responsibility.  Defining quality, defining aim is essential for local control of public education to have any meaning.   Scoring well on state tests is only a small part of how quality public education should be defined.   A community discussion concerning school purpose, concerning the future of public education, I believe, is a valuable conversation essential to have as part of a school board election process.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | 8 Comments

What Quality Guru W. Edward Deming Had To Say About Reforming and Improving Public Education

Dr. W. Edwards Deming

Dr. W. Edwards Deming

In 1992 I was a teacher member of the “Quality Committee” for West Carrollton Schools. Our goal was to study Total Quality Management and make recommendation of how to incorporate its principles in West Carrollton. As part of this study, everyone on the committe (selected West Carrollton teachers, administrators and some parents) read William Glasser’s great book, “The Quality School.”

Quite unexpectedly, our Quality Committee received an invitation for two of our members to attend a four day seminar conducted by the foremost acknowledged guru of the quality movement — W. Edwards Deming — at no charge. The Assistent Superintendent of West Carrollton Schools, David Weekly, and I were selected to attend and we traveled to Florida where the seminar was conducted. It was a great experience. We helped with the seminar organizer with the grunt work and details of the seminar in exchange for free attendance. Dr. Deming was 92 years old at the time and lived but one more year — very active up to the last.

I got a chance to have a 25 minute interview with Dr. Deming, and I wrote up all the details in our teacher magazine that I edited. I recently found the copy of this magazine and scanned the articles and made a PDF — which I am posting here.

At the seminar were mostly business leaders who had paid about $1000 to attend. Dr Deming’s general comments and approach to system reform, I believe, speaks to the topics of public education design, general educational theory, and strategies for reforming and improving public education. I’ve frequently quoted Dr. Deming in articles that I’ve written about education. See here, here, and here.

These are my notes from the seminar, with direct quotes from Dr. Deming:

  1. Quality goes down when ranking people.
  2. Reward for good performance may be the same as reward to the weather man for a pleasant day.
  3. Cramming facts into students heads is not learning.
  4. Information is not knowledge.
  5. To learn means to learn theory, not facts and information.
  6. Abolish grades in school, from toddlers on up through the university. When graded, pupils put emphasis on the grade, not on learning.
  7. Customers expect what producers lead them to expect. We didn’t ask for the electric light bulb.
  8. Be guided by theory not by figures. The most important things don’t have figures to go along with them.
  9. You cannot measure performance. If you thought you could, you are wrong.
  10. We know the cost of training, but the benefit we will never know. Why do we do it? We are guided by theory.
  11. Numerical goals are nonsense, hot air. A goal leads to distortion and faking. What is important is how to get there: BY WHAT METHOD? If you can accomplish a goal without a method, then why were you not doing it last year? There is only one possible answer: You were goofing off.
  12. AMERICA 2000 provides a horrible example of goals, but no method. By what method? Example: “High school graduation will be at least 90%” Why not make the goal 95%? What is important is: BY WHAT METHOD?
  13. AMERICA 2000 says, “Every school in America will ensure that students learn.” Sound great, but how, by what method?
  14. Deming’s First Theorem: Nobody gives a hoot about profit — sustained profit — if we did we would operate as a system.
  15. Deming’s Second Theorem: We are ruined by people doing their best without knowledge. There is no substitute for knowledge. Without theory there are no questions, without questions, there is no learning.
  16. The most important losses are unknowable.
  17. Promote joy in work by making the worker part of the system.
  18. Managers talk about getting rid of deadwood, but there are only two possible explanations of why the dead wood exists: 1) You hired deadwood in the first place, or, 2) you hired live wood, and then you killed it.
  19. Boiling water takes a while for you to see any change, then all of a sudden things start to happen. Have faith in the process We must know what changes to make.
  20. There is in any journey an origin and a destination. The origin is the prevailing style of management. The destination is transformation.
  21. Most people don’t know how they are imprisoned by the current practices of management. Hard work, best efforts, and best intentions will not by themselves produce quality.
  22. Transformation of management is required , learning and application of profound knowledge is required. Change is not enough. Change will not do it. It must be transformation. Transformation is like moving from ice to water. We know much about ice. We need to learn about water.
  23. Management in any form is prediction. rational prediction requires theory.
  24. The aim of a system must be clear to everyone in the system. Without an aim, there is no system. Think of a tiger. He has aim. He enjoys life today and assures tigers for the future.
  25. Let me ask you: Is you company a system? — Sure it has people running about, telephones, budgets — But is it a system? Is your company a system or just individual profit centers?
  26. A system must be managed, it will not manage itself. By focusing on a system of quality, everybody wins.
Posted in Special Reports | 6 Comments