My New Book — Public Education 2030 — Invites Readers To Discuss The Future Of Our School System

The book I am posting today — Public Education 2030, The Singularity Approaches —  focuses on the future of public education.

I’ve shortened and summarized twenty-five of my previous posts on education so that most will fit on one page. I’ve added an “Introduction”, a “Message from the Author” and a “Conclusion” and I’ve grouped the posts into six sections: 1) The Singularity Approaches 2) Reforming Public Education 3) Building A Better System 4) The Aim of the System 5) Great Teachers and the Profession of Teaching 6) Good Character, the Key to Success 6) The Importance of Civic Education.

My goal in putting this publication together is twofold:

  • To make the case that a redesign of the system of public education is needed and
  • To invite readers to enter into brainstorming conversations about the future of public education.

The book is a total of only 60 pages and contains live links to all of the articles/books that I reference. You may download a PDF of the book here .  It’s an easy read on my iPad and I’m sure it will work on other reading devices as well. I am going to have a few copies printed at Lulu.com  — the great online publisher that three years ago printed my first collection of web-posts Why You Are Not Entitled To Your Opinion.

 

The introduction to the book — posted below — indicates that soon I will be starting a new web-site, OhioTownHall, but this site is not yet ready to be launched. I’m anticipating that this new site will be ready to go in a short time and when it is ready to go live online, I will announce it here on DaytonOS.

Introduction

The essays in this book originally were written as web-posts. They show the point of view of a retired public school teacher who very much wants public education to succeed and who appreciates the hard work of the many talented teachers, administrators and board members in the present system. The message of this book, however, is that public education is in need of a major overhaul. The system of public education is poorly designed; its goals of public education are too narrow; and as it is, even the highest rated schools are accomplishing way too little.

Most schools post nice sounding goals about developing student potential and forming solid citizens, but, the fact is, schools do not expend their resources on accomplishing these admirable aims. Because of the No Child Left Behind law, schools obsess over government school evaluations and focus their efforts on accomplishing just one goal — producing acceptable test scores. The narrow aim of raising test scores has become the controlling mission of public schools and, to accomplish this mission, school time is precisely controlled, curriculum carefully aligned, and the definition of “good teaching” narrowly defined.

Schools are stuck in the business of schooling — transmitting curriculum, grading, preparing for tests — but to fulfill the wonderful goals posted on their websites, schools would need to be in the business of education. It is a great thought that schools should help each child achieve his or her potential, but a school designed to accomplish this goal would need to be built on a solid theory of motivation and on an enriched understanding of human nature now largely absent in today’s schools. A school focused on helping students fulfill their potential would need to empower and free both teachers and students in ways that seem unthinkable in the present system.

I’ve entitled this book Public Education 2030, The Singularity Approaches because the big point I hope this book will communicate is that we need to be forward looking. We need to do the hard work of building a new system capable of sustaining our democracy; we need to build a system equipped with the capacity to successfully meet the challenges of the future. The term “singularity” is taken from the writings of futurist Ray Kurzweil, an acknowledged genius with over 17 honorary degrees, who predicts that a coming revolution in technology will create a world for today’s children astonishingly different from the world of their parents and grandparents. To thrive in the transformed world in which they will live, children will need a transformative education that will lift them to a full development of their humanity. The qualities of thoughtfulness, leadership, creativity, and character that seem exceptional today will need to be commonplace tomorrow.

This book points to these conclusions:

  • The aim of public education must be the advancement of the common good, which means — 1) Each child will acquire the tools and experience needed to develop his or her potential, and 2)  Each child will gain the knowledge, habits, temperament, and character that will empower him or her to be an effective citizen.
  • The system of public education must be restructured so that all the resources available to the system will be focused on accomplishing the aim of the system.
  • The transformation needed in public education will require a vitalization of local democracy resulting in communities regaining local control of their schools.

This book does not attempt to show what a transformed system of public education might look like. The goal of this book is twofold: 1) To make the case that a redesign of the system of public education is needed and 2) To invite readers to enter into brainstorming conversations about the future of public education.  I hope these essays will be helpful in promoting thoughtful dialogue. I am posting this book on a new web-site — OhioTownHall.com. — where ideas for restructuring eventually also will be posted. You are invited to join me there.

 

 

Posted in Special Reports | 3 Comments

Spring Flowers At Centerville Church Are In Honor Of My Friend And Brother-In-Law, Jim Dunaway


What a beautiful spring!

Last fall, at the end of the bulb planting season, I bought a ton of spring bulbs for 50% off and on several chilly November days, I planted them at the front of Centerville Methodist Church. I planted the bulbs in honor of my brother-in-law, Jim Dunaway and at the four year anniversary of his passing, April 20, they were blooming gloriously. I’m glad they turned out so beautifully and that the members of the church are very happy with their appearance. Last week when I had help from a friend I took these pictures and made a slide show video. I used an organ rendition of Bach’s “Jesu Joy Of Man’s Desiring” as the accompaniment. I posted the video on you-tube along with this description:

My brother-in-law, Jim Dunaway, passed away on April 20, 2009, at age 72 — a great loss to our family and to the many who knew him as their pastor and friend. Jim served over 50 years in the Methodist ministry, and after his official retirement he served as an assistant minister at Centerville Methodist Church. The spring bulbs making these wonderful flowers were planted in honor of Jim, in appreciation of the optimism, love and joy he shared with everyone who knew him. Late in the afternoon, on April 21, 2013, there was slight breeze ending a beautiful day and these little flowers were clapping their hands.

 

Previous Posts About Jim’s Passing:

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment

Caroline Gentry And Jim Butler — OHD 41 — Will Have Lincoln-Douglas Type Debate At KHS On Friday, Nov 2

This is great news: Caroline Gentry and Jim Butler — candidates seeking election to represent District 41 in the Ohio House — will participate in a Lincoln Douglas style debate on Friday, November 2. The debate will be at Kettering High School on Shroyer Rd. in the Recital Hall starting at 3:45 PM.

Republican Jim Butler is the incumbent, appointed to the position last January. This is his first election. Caroline Gentry is the Democratic challenger. And this is her first election.

The program will last for one hour and the public is invited to attend.

In the 34 minute debate portion of the program, both candidates will speak four times for total of 17 minutes:

  • 7 minutes      First Speaker
  • 7 minutes      Second Speaker
  • 5 minutes      First Speaker
  • 5 minutes      Second Speaker
  • 3 minutes      First Speaker
  • 3 minutes      Second Speaker
  • 2 minutes      First Speaker
  • 2 minutes      Second Speaker

A coin toss will determine who is the first speaker.

For the remainder of the hour program, candidates will respond to questions from the audience, taking turns as to who will answer first, and with each response limited to two minutes.

I am delighted that here at the last minute, this could come together. Last February I asked Mr. Butler if he might agree to such an exchange and he said, “Sure.” From, Republican Jim Butler, OHD-41, Likes Idea Of “Lincoln Douglas” Debates With Democratic Challenger:

This may be a great year for citizens in OHD-41. Two excellent, articulate candidates, both thoughtful individuals with impressive credentials, both, I believe, well meaning and seeking to do what is best for Ohio, may actually conduct a campaign that will elevate our political discourse and cause thoughtful participation by voters. It would be a great compliment to the citizens of OHD-41 if “Lincoln Douglas” type debates between Gentry and Butler would actually happen.

And, so I’m happy this is actually happening — and between two highly qualified and very articulate candidates. It should be an interesting afternoon and I hope a lot of the public will attend. Kettering HS Principal Von Handorf showed me the Recital Hall — what a great facility — it will hold 200 people.

The original Lincoln-Douglas debates lasted three hours: The first speaker spoke for 60 minutes, the second speaker than spoke for 90 minutes, and then, the first speaker than spoke for 30 minutes. In the Lincoln-Douglas format, there is no moderator asking questions, but instead, the candidates have full discretion in the use of their time. This is a format that I wish could be used more often and hopefully this debate will be such a success that in future elections this format will be requested by the public.

Terry Morris of the Dayton Daily News recently wrote an article about the Butler / Gentry contest:

Both candidates who want to represent Ohio’s new 41st House District are young Oakwood attorneys who attend St. Albert the Great Church in Kettering and have never been elected to office.

That’s where the similarities end between Republican freshman incumbent Jim Butler and his Democratic challenger Caroline Gentry.

Butler says innovation and common sense — not higher taxes — are the way to continue the state’s economic revival. “Making Ohio the best and most competitive state in the country, which we can do, will make people want to move here. Companies will add jobs. Workers will get raises. That will provide more money for government services,” he said.

He’s been endorsed by the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Ohio Manufacturers Association PAC, National Federation of Independent Businesses, Buckeye Firearms Association, Ohio Right to Life, Ohio Society of CPAs, Ohio Veterans United, Ohio State Medical Association and Ohio Farm Bureau.

Gentry said government services are in danger right now due to funding cuts to schools and local governments. “We need to invest in safer neighborhoods and excellent schools. That’s what will promote businesses and attract talented people to move here.”

Her endorsements include: Teamsters Local 957, Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio, Ohio Association of Professional Firefighters, Ohio Federation of Teachers, IUE-CWA, Dayton Miami Valley AFL-CIO and Ohio Association of Public Employees.

 

Ohio House of Representatives:

  • 41st District: Centerville, Dayton (wards 9 and 20), Kettering, Oakwood and several precincts of Riverside
  • Term of Office:  Two years
  • Annual salary:  $60,584

Jim Butler

  • Age:  39

    Jim Butler

  • Residence:  Oakwood
  • Education:  Bachelor’s degree from the U.S. Naval Academy; masters from the University of Maryland; law degree from the University of Cincinnati
  • Employment:  State representative; Attorney at Thompson Hine
  • Political Party:  Republican
  • Political history:  Appointed 37th District representative, 2011
  • Website:  www.butlerforohio.com

Caroline Gentry

  • Age:  42
  • Residence:  Oakwood
  • Education:  Bachelor’s degree, Kalamazoo College; law degree from Yale University

    Caroline Gentry

  • Employment:  Partner, Porter, Wright, Morris and Arthur
  • Political party:  Democratic
  • Political history:  Never held elected office
  • Website: www.carolinegentry.com

 

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment