Our Democracy Is Failing And It’s All Your Fault — So, Buy My Book

I’m thinking that one way to hawk my new LuLu book, “Why You Are Not Entitled To Your Opinion,” might be to start going about and making speeches.

Last night I was the special speaker at the Northridge Kiwanis Club — guest of my high school teachers, Larry O’Donnell and Mary Jo Withrow, and my high school neighbor, and friend, Vaughn Beams. Northridge Kiwanis meets every Thursday at the Airport Hotel Restaurant. The same people have been meeting together for years, sometimes as few as three or four people show up and sometimes more than twenty. It’s a great group of people.

As I drove from Kettering to the airport, I was thinking of the advice that it is good to start a speech with a joke. The last joke I heard, a very old joke recently revived by my brother-in-law, I was thinking might work. The joke starts, “A man comes home from church choir practice with two black eyes.” It’s sort of a “how do you explain the unexplainable” sort of story and I was thinking this story might be a good introduction to my question: Why is our country getting black eyes, why are we suffering from man-made, unnecessary disasters?

My goal in meeting with the Northridge Kiwanis was to work on developing a presentation promoting DaytonOS. I feel that DaytonOS has great potential, but, I know if DaytonOS is ever to take off, I need get on the ball and start talking to people and groups who might be interested in helping. Service clubs often invite speakers to their meetings, and, my thought is that eventually I might have the opportunity to explain DaytonOS to some interested service clubs throughout the county.

Larry asked about the title of my speech. I didn’t have a good answer. I’m now thinking a possible title might be, “When Democracy Fails.” Maybe something more pointed might be better, like, “Our Democracy Is Failing And It’s All Your Fault.” Or maybe I could take Dennis Kucinich’s cue and entitle my speech, “Wake up America. Wake up America. Wake up America.”

An evangelical approach, I’m thinking, as a speech structure might be best. After raising the tension in the room to a new sense of urgency about the dangerously degraded state of our democracy, after raising a sense of conviction that each of us has failed our democracy, I then would offer an avenue for salvation. My message: Get involved in DaytonOS.

Sorry to say, I pooped out on the joke about the choir member with black eyes. I couldn’t quite muster enough gumption to tell it. Now, I have speaker’s remorse.

After Larry’s nice introduction, I gave everyone a paper with four questions. The first question: “Lincoln spoke of assuring that a government of the people, by the people and for the people should not perish from the earth. On a scale of zero to 100, to what degree do we have a government of the people, by the people and for the people?”

The average of the answers to that question was 40%. The numbers ranged from 20% to 60%. I said 30%.

These numbers inspired a good conversation. The point I emphasized was that even if the most positive of these numbers — 60% — is the most accurate, our democracy, compared to its potential has a lot of room for improvement. On most scales, a score of 60% is failing or near failing.

I’m wondering what a Gallup poll might show about how Montgomery County citizens, in general, rate the effectiveness of their democracy. I’m wondering what the trained objectivity of an anthropologist might show. The evidence to me seems pretty overwhelming that ours is a weak and failing democracy, but it would be nice to have a 200 page, well footnoted report, to help make the case.

The fact that our democracy is weak has exacted a big price from all of us. We are all missing out on what could have been.  I told the group about a famous book I saw in college.  It was written in 1967 by Herman Kahn and Norbert Weiner, “The Year 2000.” (I need to reread this book. Amazon has used copies for $2.99.) Kahn predicted that by the year 2000 things would be wonderful. Prosperity would be widespread. People would be earning a good living and would be working many fewer hours doing so. Everyone would have gobs of leisure time.

In 1967 when Kahn’s book was written, auto workers were doing great. There were a lot of good jobs. Unions were strong. The book correctly predicted that great leaps in productivity would create enormous new wealth, but its assumption that this wealth would be fairly distributed was flat wrong. I recently quoted Robert Reich: “In 1980 the top earning 1% of Americans took home 9% of the nation’s total income — but in 2007, the top 1% took home over 22% of all income.” (I need to find how the top 1% fared in 1967.)

The world in the year 2000 turn out quite differently than what Kahn predicted. I’m theorizing that Kahn’s predictions were very wrong because he failed to foresee the tragic failure of our democracy.  He failed to foresee the fact that in election after election our democracy would bring to power governments hostile to the interests of average people, indifferent to the common good.

Because our democracy failed to protect and advance the common good, the last forty years, for great portions of our citizenry, have brought big disappointments. We now could be enjoying the world envisaged by Kahn, but, because our democracy failed, we have settled for so much less. As a nation, we arrive at the year 2009 in a frightful state. We face the prospect of great disasters — all unnecessary, all man-made. Obama writes, in the preface to his budget, that our financial mess was “neither the result of a normal turn of the business cycle nor an accident of history.” Obama blames the crisis on “irresponsibility.” He doesn’t go far enough. He needs to connect the dots. He needs to be clear that the plague of irresponsible behavior arose because our democracy failed, because our government became the government of special interests, not the government of the people.  (I recently posted, President Obama Must Make This Wake-Up Call To Action: Our System Of Democracy Has Failed Us.)

The fourth question on the paper, I gave to the Kiwanis club attendees, got personal and asked each person to rate themselves.  The question asked: On a scale of zero to 100, to what degree do you, personally, understand what is actually happening in government, to what degree do you understand the issues and challenges that government needs to address?

Here, the average of the answers was 30%. Quite an admission. Connect the dots: We have met the enemy and it is us. We are all sinners. I encouraged my listeners to confess and made my own confession that, although I live five blocks from the Kettering Government Center, I don’t know beans about what goes on in that place. There wasn’t a dry eye in the house as we each told of our shortcomings as citizens.

Well, it wasn’t quite that way. But it was a nice evening and when I asked for my food bill, I was told that the club picked up the tab. Wow. My first perk as author.  And one person even offered to buy my book. I didn’t have any.  These books are going fast.  I’m already through my second edition (5 copies each addition).  I need to order more from Lulu.  The idea is that for each new order I’ll correct more errors and other changes and declare a new edition.  Maybe I’ll make a new cover and new title:  “Our Democracy Is Failing And It’s All Your Fault. So, Buy This Book.”

I didn’t quite make it to my grand conclusion last night. My time was up and then some, and the place to wherever we were headed was still on the horizon.  But I’ve been trying to envisage myself in front of a meeting of people I don’t know.  My whole point in making such an endeavor would be to promote DaytonOS, so, right now, I thinking the conclusion to my presentation might be some improved version of this:

“In conclusion, We are in trouble because our democracy is failing and even worse trouble will certainly befall us, unless we can get our democracy to work. We cannot have an effective democracy without an informed and engaged citizenry. We cannot have an effective democracy without meaningful community.  Help DaytonOS become a transformative educative community.  Join DaytonOS.  Become a leader. Donate money. Buy this book. (Profits go to DaytonOS.)  Thanks for having me.  And yes, I accept checks.”
Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

Posted in Special Reports | 1 Comment

Paul Krugman: “Boehner’s Idea of Economics Is Completely Insane”

Economist Paul Krugman in a recent blog writes about Dayton congressman, John Boehner: “Boehner’s idea of economics is completely insane.”

Krugman absolutely disagrees with Boehner’s thinking and seems to be in honest despair that a congressional leader with a lot of influence could actually advocate Boehner’s view.  Krugman asks, “Can this country be saved?”

Krugman strongly disagrees with Boehner’s hard stance on government spending. Boehner keeps repeating this theme: “It’s time for government to tighten their belts and show the American people that we ‘get’ it.”

Krugman writes, “He (Boehner) is talking about the current economic crisis as if it were a harvest failure — as if we faced a shortage of goods, so that the more you consume the less is left for me. In reality — even most conservatives understand this, when they think about it — we’re in a world desperately short of demand. If you consume more, that’s GOOD for me, because it helps create jobs and raise incomes. It’s in my personal disinterest to have you tighten your belt — and that’s just as true if you’re ‘the government’ as if you’re my neighbor.”

Posted in Special Reports | 13 Comments

Montgomery County Democrats Recommend To Senate Caucus That Fred Strahorn Replace Tom Roberts

I just returned from a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Montgomery County Democratic Party.  About 20 people were in attendance.  The committee voted to recommend Fred Strahorn to replace Tom Roberts as senator for the 5th District.  Roberts recently resigned from the Ohio Senate in order to accept an appointment from Governor Strickland to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.

Roberts’ replacement eventually will be determined by a vote of the Democratic Senate Caucus, which consists of 11 Democratic senators.  The Chair of the Montgomery County Democratic Party, Mark Owens, was requested by the Caucus to submit up to three names of candidates to be considered for the replacement.  Mark, in turn, called a special meeting of the Executive Committee to receive its input.

The Committee heard short presentations by both Strahorn and by Victor Harris.  Both individuals are impressive individuals and both made good presentations.  The Committee, predictably, strongly favored Strahorn.  Eventually a motion was made and seconded that the committee recommend Strahorn.

I made the point that, because Senator Roberts has strongly recommended Strahorn, it is is a safe bet that Strahorn will get the appointment, and that recommending Vic Harris in addition to Strahorn would certainly not change that fact.

I suggested an amendment to the motion.  My thought was that the Montgomery County Democratic Executive Committee should use the opportunity to recommend up to three candidates to include Vic in the recommendation and, by doing, give Vic some encouragement.  Vic, I feel, has the capacity for a great political career, and more importantly, the capacity to establish a new quality of Democratic leadership.  I moved that the motion be amended to not only recommend Strahorn, but also to recommend Vic Harris.  My motion died for lack of a second.  Wow.  That lack of a second makes you feel unpopular. The will of the group was that only one person should be recommended — Strahorn.

The discussion brought out the fact that the group wanted to make certain that their message to the Democratic Senate Caucus was not diluted.  The message:  Fred Strahorn is are only candidate recommended by the Montgomery County Democratic Party.

I was surprised that the discussion revealed lingering anger at Vic for defying the Party last year and seeking to become the Democratic Party’s candidate for the 40th Ohio House District.  ( For some history, see the article I wrote one year ago:  Victor Harris: Surprised That Local Democratic Party Wanted To Suppress Primary Competition.)

The Party endorsed and supported Roland Winburn in the primary last year.  The fact that Vic ran against this endorsed candidate, evidently, is still point of irritation to some members of the Executive Committee.  Vic organized a great campaign, but was not able to overcome the force of the party establishment that printed handbills showing that Roland was the officially endorsed candidate of the Montgomery County Democratic Party.  It is no wonder that uninformed 40th District Democrats listened to their Party’s endorsement.  Roland won by 56% to 44%.

I wrote an article last week that cited a DDN editorial criticizing the anti-democratic process whereby only a handful of politicians will decide who should replace Roberts —  “Ohio Senate rises above democracy.” Today’s action by Montgomery County Democrats, that constricts recommendation to the Ohio Democratic Senate Caucus to just one choice,  makes the process criticized by the DDN become even more closed, even more anti-democratic.

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment