Health Insurance Reform To Be Decided By Six Senators — Mostly From Sparsely Populated, Very White States

According to an article in The New York Times, it looks like the chance for health reform is in the hands of a bi-partisan committee of six senators. This committee has already rejected the notion of a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insures and it has also dismissed a plan by House Democrats to pay for health reform via an income surtax on high income earners.

An article by Nathan Newman at Talking Points Memo analyzes this small, but evidently, crucial senate group. In “The Tyranny of the Tiny White States,” Newman identifies the senators and shows that they are from tiny states with mostly white populations:

  • Max Baucus of Montana (pop 935,670- 89.2% white)
  • Kent Conrad of North Dakota (pop 636,677- 90.1% white)
  • Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico (pop 1,928,384- 42.8% white)
  • Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming (pop 509,294- 88.8% white)
  • Charles E. Grassley of Iowa (pop 2,966,334- 91.5% white)
  • Olympia Snowe of Maine (pop 1,321,505 – 96% white).

Newman writes: “Altogether, this rump group of negotiators represent just 8.3 million Americans or less than 3% of the population and only 1.6 million non-whites. Subtract Bingaman and that last number drops to just 521,000 non-whites represented by this group of Senate negotiators deciding the fate of health care for a diverse population of almost 300 million Americans.

“Structurally, this is what bipartisanship means. The tyranny of tiny states and the exclusion of non-white concerns.

“This is the structural racism built into a Constitution two hundred years ago to exclude the voting power of slaves and to this day privileges the power of a handful of small, mostly white states to undermine the will of the majority in our nation.”

Posted in Special Reports | 5 Comments

The Creation Museum’s Shocking Indoctrination Effort Reminds — Only The Authority Of Reason Can Save Us

This is the second post about the Creation Museum. The first post is here.

It seems hard to believe, evidently, a large percentage of Americans — 40% – 50% — agree with the Creation Museum’s point of view — that the world is 6000 years old, etc. (It’s hard to believe that the percentages are so great, but, see this poll and this poll.) The stunning realization that such a big percentage of Americans are in such absolute denial of reality prompts some big questions.

Here in 2009, only a person who has been indoctrinated, brainwashed in a sense, could believe the world is only 6000 years old. Such a belief cannot come from any independent thinking. Its existence in any person’s reality structure indicates relentless indoctrination — often from a early age.

Wow. To realize that a huge chunk of the American citizenry have been successfully indoctrinated to accept a completely crazy, irrational idea about humanity’s origin raises the question about what other crazy ideas Americans have been indoctrinated to believe. This widespread indoctrination raises the question of whether the problem is that American education system regularly produces graduates that are easily indoctrinated. There is a lot of evidence, in fact, that indoctrination is a big part of the American education system, and, that the mission, purpose, and daily function of most American schools is to indoctrinate students. A successful school, certainly, is seen as one where students are made to be pliable and agreeable to manipulation by those in control.

In education and in life in general, a big question that needs to be answered is: What constitutes authority? Indoctrination is empowered by the idea that the individual has no independent authority in him or herself, but instead, must acquiesce to a powerful authority that is outside of himself or herself. The whole point of the Creation Museum is that the authority that should guide everyone’s thinking is the literal words of the Bible. The museum teaches that the words of the Bible have authority because they are the literal words of God, and mere mortals should not question God’s words.

The museum has a number of displays that disparages rational thinking. The displays say that when human rationality is the starting point, the result is error and eventual disaster (including the disaster of eternal punishment), but when the words of the Bible are the starting point, then the result is truth (and personal salvation).

Education often operates from the same definition of authority — a definition that sees the student as an empty vessel to be filled, one that sees the point of education as indoctrination, one that agrees with the museum’s notion of original sin, and sees the student as full of sin and error and in need of correction and direction. Students are rewarded for right answers, for following directions, for acquiescing to their teacher and school. Often the authority demonstrated in school is simply positional power — the power to reward or punish. It is easy to see that graduates from our system of education are prepared for a life time of indoctrination by the media and by power figures in their society. It is not surprising that many of these graduates, acclimated to the notion that they have no authority within their own thinking, readily accept the authority of quacks and extremists.

The Creation Museum, by its advocating the most radical of antievolution stands, the “Young Earth” stand, I think, may do a great favor, because it makes the question of what constitutes authority such a stark, compelling question. The focus of this whole $35 million museum is to ask: How can we know truth? What is our authority for knowing truth?

The great popularity of the Creation Museum forces us to acknowledge that indoctrination is very much in force in our whole society and that, if we could see the total landscape of what Americans believe — about our history, about our own society, about the world, about how to achieve peace — we’d be astounded to see beliefs equally as goofy and unfounded as a belief that the world is only 6000 years old. The popularity of the museum, and its emphasis on indoctrination, should force us to examine who or what we accept as authority and should shock us into once again realizing that the human race is doomed unless somehow there is a transformation in humanity’s thinking — toward a new respect for truth and for the authority of reason.

Posted in M Bock | 51 Comments

The Creation Museum Advances An Astonishing Point Of View That Repudiates Modern Science

This is a two part article and the second part is here.

The Creation Museum has a point of view — a point of view that is astonishingly anti science — that is the focus of the museum. It acknowledges that its purpose is to advance this point of view. Any objective observer would accurately described the museum as a sophisticated, coordinated and expensive work of propaganda. And the museum itself, I imagine, would be proud to acknowledge that fact. It seeks to convince, and, the museum’s point of view is the most radical anti evolution point of view possible, the “Young Earth” view, and the museum seeks to persuade attendees that its point of view is true.

It is amazing that people pushing this point of view raised $35 million or so to build the Creation Museum. The museum is located off in Kentucky off I-275, 10 miles west of I-75, toward the Cincinnati Airport.

The museum has beautiful grounds and state of the art displays. It has automated lifelike figures, huge dinosaurs, etc. It’s very high quality. I visited yesterday — two adults and a child cost about $50. Regardless of the cost, the place was full of people — I heard that usually more than 2000 people attend each day. It has a gift shop where I bought this amazing element collecting guide book and it also has many restaurants. It offers photographs and special features that cost extra (the planetarium costs $7 extra per person). This place takes in a ton of money. I’d love to know how much and how the profits are distributed. You’ve got to wonder if the opportunity to make big bucks was part of the motivation for starting this attraction.

The Creation Museum, run by a group called Answers in Genesis, teaches that the world is 6013 years old and that all 6.5 billion humans now on earth came all from a very small group of humans that survived a world wide cataclysmic event, a great flood, 4350 years ago. This Great Flood, according to the museum, wiped out all human beings in the entire world — except a small group of survivors, at most, fifty or one hundred people, led by a man named Noah. The whole story of Noah and the Ark plays a big part of the museum’s explanation. You might think that the Grand Canyon came about because of millions of years of erosion, but the museum teaches it came about in a short time because of the great force unleashed by the Great Flood.

The Creation Museum teaches that the Great Flood also would have destroyed all animals had Noah not saved a pair of each, and all animals that we presently know today came from that small group of animals from 4350 years ago. A scaled down replica of the Ark that Noah built is shown in the Museum. And, by the way, all dinosaurs, according to the Museum, were very much alive at the time of the Great Flood, and various displays in the museum show humans and dinosaurs in the same scene.

The point of view of the Creation Museum repudiates everything modern science says about the origins of the earth and the origins of humanity. The museum’s point of view demands that the words of Genesis be accepted as being literally true. When the Bible says “day,” according to the museum, it means 24 hours and when the Bible says the first human, Adam, was created in one day, it means exactly that. And, since the present generation can be traced back to the original human, in order for the generations to work out, Adam had to have been created in exactly 4004 BC — all at once, out of nothing, fully formed. The museum says that when humans rely on human reason to find truth, instead of finding truth, humans find error. The point of view of the museum is that the literal meaning of the words of ancient scripture reveals literal truth. The writer of Genesis clearly meant a day to mean 24 hours and, according to the museum, there is no reason to think that the Bible doesn’t mean exactly what its words originally were meant to say. Ancient people had words to describe eons, but the writer of Genesis deliberately chose the word, “day.” Fair enough.

This is amazing that here in 2009 a state of the art, high quality museum is so brazenly teaching anti scientific ideas. And, it is astounding that educated, prosperous, middle class Americans, in 2009, can agree with and support such a shockingly radical, anti-intellectual point of view, to the point of making this museum, by all appearances, a huge financial success. Who was it that said that nobody ever went broke by underestimating the thinking of Americans?

Carole and Matt out side of The Creation Museum

Carole and Ike at the entrance to The Creation Museum. The museum advances a “Young Earth” belief that says dinosaurs and humans at one time were contemporaries.

Posted in Special Reports | 31 Comments