Gov. Strickland To Dayton’s UAW: “I Am Honored To Be Part Of You. We Are In This Together”

In his talk, yesterday, at the UAW Hall in Dayton, Gov. Strickland emphasized that as a member of congress and as Ohio’s governor, he has done everything possible to help working families. He said, “I am honored to be with you in this union hall. I am honored to be part of you. We are in this together.” He was warmly received by the 60 people, or so, in attendance.

Strickland said the recession that has cost so many jobs did not have to happen, but was the direct result of the failed policies of George Bush and the Republicans. And he said his opponent, John Kasich, and other Republican candidates — Rob Portman and Mike DeWine — are “retreads” with “no new ideas.” Strickland charged: “All they want to do is to take us back to the Bush economic policies that brought this recession on in the first place.”

Strickland said that between he and Kasich there are stark differences — revealed in their congressional records. Strickland said Kasich was a “Wall Streeter Congressman” during his 18 years in congress — consistently voting for laws to allow the outsourcing of good jobs and to give tax cuts for the very wealthy, and that Kasich consistently voted against measures to help working families. Kasich voted for NAFTA, Strickland was opposed. Kasich voted to give China most favored trade status, Strickland was opposed.

In the question period (not captured on my video becuase my battery expired), one member pointed out, with great appreciation, an important part of Strickland’s congressional record: Strickland voted against approving the Iraq War.

This is my second post about Strickland’s speech to Dayton’s UAW.  Also see: Gov. Strickland Blasts Kasich’s Opposition To Accepting $400 Million To Build A New Train System In Ohio

The talk is divided into two segments — an edited transcript follows each segment.

Thank you. I am happy to be here. I came here today to talk as candidly as possible about what is at stake in this election. Some elections the difference between the candidates is minor. But I can tell you, when it comes to John Kasich and me we just flat out disagree about everything that is important to you, your families and community. We flat out disagree. The differences are stark and they are the result of the history the two of us have in congress and our time since leaving congress.

John Kasich was in congress for 18 years. I was there for 12 years and if you look at our records they are as different as day and night.

So I want to talk with you about some of the differences and the choice people will be facing this year. On NAFTA, I voted “No,” Kasich voted, “Yes.” There was a vote on whether to grant China most favored trade status. I voted “No,” he voted, “Yes.”

Kasich record is worse than simply casting those votes. As chairmen of the House Budget Committee, Kasich put forth a budget that eliminated Trade Adjustment Assistance. TAA, as it is called, is a federal program to help workers who lost their jobs because of outsourcing from unfair trade, from the subsidizing of imports… And Kasich tried to eliminate this program. That shows a major difference between us.

John Kasich was a Wall Street congressman long before he went to Wall Street (to work for Lehman Brothers). He put forth budgets that cut child nutrition programs. He wanted to privatize Social Security. He wanted to cut education. He left congress after 18 years and tried to run for president for a few months. That didn’t go so well. So he was rewarded with a job on Wall Street. He became on the the managing directors for Lehman Brothers. …

As a director of Lehman Brothers, Kasich approached the Ohio public pension system, pitching investments with Lehman Brothers. … In 2008, the only year he revealed his tax returns. …. He reported that he received a bonus of over $400,000. What was happening in Lehman Brothers when he was getting that bonus. They were headed for bankruptcy and that bankruptcy cost Ohio pensions over $400 million. No wonder he won’t release his other tax returns — because we don’t know how many millions he received from Lehman Brothers up to that time.

Kasich is a Wall Streeter to the core. He was a wall streeter even before he went to wall street, because what he did in congress supported the outsourcing of our jobs. He provided tax cuts to the most wealthy people in our country. What Kasich did in congress was not to work for you or me or the people we know and associate with, he always stood up for the already wealthy. so he has become a millionaire. There’s nothing wrong with becoming a millionaire, but I’d like to know what he did to earn those millions. I’d like to know what deals he was involved in. I’d like to know what he did for Lehman Brothers that qualified him to get a $400,000 bonus as the company was going into bankruptcy. … It raises some questions that Ohioans deserve to have answered before they go vote. What happened on Wall Street is responsible for jobs that we lost.

My Dad was a steel worker and he supported his nine kids. I understand what it like to be a working person. I understand what it means to be unemployed.

Ohio is the only state in America that froze tuition for two years. … We’ve done more than any other state to hold down cost for college. We’ve invested in education. We’ve invested in job training.

Last month we created 17,000 jobs. We are starting to claw our way back. People need to understand that this ditch is really deep and as the president said, “The people who put this car in the ditch now want to be given the keys. they want the keys back.” the point is, the policies that created this recession, a recession that did not have to happen, are the same policies that John Kasich, and Rob Portman, and Mike DeWine advocate. … Talk about retreads. They want to come back and do more of what they’ve already done… They have no new ideas. No new ideas. All they want to do is support tax cuts for the richest people in America, support Wall Streeters who want to outsource our jobs. They want to place the tax burden increasingly on the backs of working people.

I’ve cut taxes since I was governor. If you were a senior citizen and own a home you got a tax cut. … We are trying to give support to people who work for a living.

Ohio has been hit hard. Outsourcing has probably effected this part of Ohio more than any other region in our state. You see the consequences of having the trade policy and having the values that led to the trade policies we’ve seen. … It is time to take care of the working middle class. It is time we reject the policies of John Kasich and Rob Portman and Mike DeWine and all of the others who can only say “No.” They have no new ideas. … All they want to do is to take us back to the Bush economic policies that brought this recession on in the first place. And so, I need your help. Lee Fisher needs your help. Richard Cordray needs your help. …

This is an important time. Early voting states in 52 days. We’d like to see 50% of the votes cast before election day. I’ve done everything I can do to support you.

I believe Ohio has a bright future …. we have everything we need in Ohio to be successful …

I am honored to be with you in this union hall. I am honored to be part of you, we are in this together. …

Posted in Local/Metro | Leave a comment

Democratic Candidate Justin Coussoule Should Demonstrate Leadership That Contrasts With John Boehner’s

Justin Coussoule, West Point graduate, is well positioned to demonstrate the leadership needed to win the 8th Congressional contest.

Justin Coussoule, Democratic candidate seeking to replace John Boehner as representative for Ohio’s 8th District, recently lambasted Boehner as showing a, “total and complete absence of leadership.”

Coussoule’s accusation — that Boehner lacks leadership — is poignant because, of course, Boehner is called “Leader” by House Republicans. Coussoule is suggesting that the emperor has no clothes.

Authentic leadership is sorely lacking most everywhere you look.  Occupying a “position of leadership” does not make one a leader. Our society suffers because, so often, persons anointed with positional authority — school board members, teachers, ministers, mayors, parents, or congressional representatives — are devoid of vision, inspiration and other qualities identified with leadership.   Positional authority does not translate into leadership.

How does one in a position of authority conduct himself or herself to make his or her group or organization achieve optimum success?  What leadership consists of, what leadership means, is profound.  Leadership is the topic of key importance for the study of management, sales, teaching — any area dealing with people or organizations.

How does one in a position of authority bring out the greatest potential of the organization, how does one help his or her business, community, classroom, parish, platoon or congressional district be all it can be?  The person who figures that out is an effective leader.  Leadership doesn’t happen accidentally or without a lot of thought and planning.

Leadership is not a matter of charisma, it is a matter of hard work.  Leadership requires a plan, it requires preparation, it requires a viewpoint grounded in reality and in knowledge.  Effective leadership is difficult and part of the dumbing down of America has involved a vitiation of leadership.

Leadership is a topic worthy of public discussion, because, without an improvement in leadership, at every level, our society will not have the capacity to grow into its potential, and worse, our society will ever more quickly deteriorate.

So, yes, Justin Coussoule should make his case:

  • This is my definition of leadership.
  • Here is John Boehner’s record of action the last 20 years he has been in Congress.
  • The record makes clear that there is a big discrepancy between Boehner’s record and the criteria for effective leadership
  • This is why any reasonable person must agree that Boehner lacks leadership.
  • Since leadership is vital, Boehner should be replaced.

But these are points of argument.  What is needed is a good example.  Coussoule must show by example.  He must show:

  • This is my definition of leadership.
  • This is how I am organizing my campaign to show in practical terms what I mean by leadership.
  • How I conduct myself in my campaign is how I will conduct myself when I am elected to represent the 8th district.

These thoughts addressed to Justin Coussoule, I hope, are accepted as helpful advice. I really think Coussoule has the potential to win, and, what a victory it would be for our democracy — if the people of the 8th district could wake up enough to replace John Boehner.  But a Coussoule victory can only come from a provocative campaign that sparks an authentic successful grassroots movement.  Victory will require authentic leadership in action.

Posted in Special Reports | 3 Comments

Gov. Strickland Blasts Kasich’s Opposition To Accepting $400 Million To Build A New Train System In Ohio

Ted Strickland, Ohio's governor, speaking to reporters at the UAW in Dayton on August 6, 2010

Ohio’s Governor, Ted Strickland, was in Dayton today at the UAW union hall on Alwildy Ave, close to Edwin C Moses Blvd.  About 60 people were in attendance. Strickland gave a short speech making the case why he should be reelected and why the election of his opponent, Republican, John Kasich, would spell disaster for Ohio.

Strickland said that it seems incredible that Kasich opposes Ohio using $400 million in federal money to create an improved rail system, but that just yesterday, Kasich went on record as saying that, if elected, he would refuse the money.

About the Ohio’s new rail system, Business Week quotes Kasich as saying, “It’s not going to happen when I become governor, OK? If you want that train, I hope you can get over that and vote for me anyway, but you’re not going to get that train.”

Strickland said he is surprised, as well, that John Husted, Kettering resident, former Speaker of the House and candidate for Secretary of State, also opposes the rail plan.  Strickland said that he imagines that Husted would normally favor such a plan but that he simply is loath to give a Democratic governor credit.

Kasich has disparaged the train plan, claiming that the trains will have an average speed of only 39 MPH.   Strickland said Kasich’s claims and criticisms of the plan are ridiculous. Business Week confirms Strickland’s view.  It writes, “Ohio’s plan, one of 13 stimulus-funded rail projects in the U.S., calls for a startup service to begin in late 2012, with four trains reaching speeds of 79 mph connecting Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton and Cincinnati.”

Dayton is positioned to hugely benefit from a train system that would include Dayton stops, Strickland said. And, he said, his hope is that the cars for the new train system will be built in Ohio and that, since he expects train development to be a big part of the nation’s future, building train cars could be a significant future source of new jobs for Ohioans.

To his union audience, Strickland said that both he and Kasich were in Congress when NAFTA was approved, but where Kasich voted “Yes,” Strickland emphasized that he voted “No.”  Strickland said that if you want to see the jobs that Kasich has created — you need to go to China. Strickland also pointed out that he voted “No” to giving China most favored trade status, but Kasich voted “Yes.”

Strickland said that not only did Kasich vote to approve NAFTA, he then also voted against the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) act that provided resources to workers who lost their jobs — because of the unfair trade practices.

Strickland emphasized that both he and Kasich, by their votes and actions, have clearly established what they value and he said the differences are striking.  He said, it is all in the record.

To see a You-tube video of Strickland’s speech: Gov. Strickland To Dayton’s UAW: “I Am Honored To Be Part Of You. We Are In This Together”

Gov Strickland with supporters at the Dayton UAW hall.

Gov. Strickland with Mike Watters, Democratic candidate for the Ohio House, District 70 (Greene County). Mike is opposing the first term Republican incumbent, Jarrod Martin.

L-R: Clayton Luckie, Democrat representing Ohio's 39th OHD; Kevin Clemons (with back to camera) of ClemCorp; Gov. Strickland; Roland Winburn, Democrat representing Ohio's 40th OHD

Posted in Special Reports | Leave a comment