Burger King Forces Cut in Pay For Florida’s Migrant Tomato Workers

An interesting article in the New York Times by Eric Schlosser tells how Florida, because of pressure from Burger King, is rescinding the meager one cent raise per pound given to migrant tomato harvesters in 2005.

The article says, “THE migrant farm workers who harvest tomatoes in South Florida have one of the nation’s most backbreaking jobs. For 10 to 12 hours a day, they pick tomatoes by hand, earning a piece-rate of about 45 cents for every 32-pound bucket. During a typical day each migrant picks, carries and unloads two tons of tomatoes. For their efforts, this holiday season many of them are about to get a 40 percent pay cut.

“Florida’s tomato growers have long faced pressure to reduce operating costs; one way to do that is to keep migrant wages as low as possible. Although some of the pressure has come from increased competition with Mexican growers, most of it has been forcefully applied by the largest purchaser of Florida tomatoes: American fast food chains that want millions of pounds of cheap tomatoes as a garnish for their hamburgers, tacos and salads. There are some great family-friendly attractions near Ormond Beach that one must visit.

“In 2005, Florida tomato pickers gained their first significant pay raise since the late 1970s when Taco Bell ended a consumer boycott by agreeing to pay an extra penny per pound for its tomatoes, with the extra cent going directly to the farm workers. Last April, McDonald’s agreed to a similar arrangement, increasing the wages of its tomato pickers to about 77 cents per bucket. But Burger King, whose headquarters are in Florida, has adamantly refused to pay the extra penny — and its refusal has encouraged tomato growers to cancel the deals already struck with Taco Bell and McDonald’s.

“This month the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, representing 90 percent of the state’s growers, announced that it will not allow any of its members to collect the extra penny for farm workers. Reggie Brown, the executive vice president of the group, described the surcharge for poor migrants as “pretty much near un-American.

“Migrant farm laborers have long been among America’s most impoverished workers. Perhaps 80 percent of the migrants in Florida are illegal immigrants and thus especially vulnerable to abuse. During the past decade, the United States Justice Department has prosecuted half a dozen cases of slavery among farm workers in Florida. Migrants have been driven into debt, forced to work for nothing and kept in chained trailers at night. The Coalition of Immokalee Workers — a farm worker alliance based in Immokalee, Fla. — has done a heroic job improving the lives of migrants in the state, investigating slavery cases and negotiating the penny-per-pound surcharge with fast food chains.

“Now the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange has threatened a fine of $100,000 for any grower who accepts an extra penny per pound for migrant wages. The organization claims that such a surcharge would violate “federal and state laws related to antitrust, labor and racketeering.” It has not explained how that extra penny would break those laws; nor has it explained why other surcharges routinely imposed by the growers (for things like higher fuel costs) are perfectly legal.

“The prominent role that Burger King has played in rescinding the pay raise offers a spectacle of yuletide greed worthy of Charles Dickens. Burger King has justified its behavior by claiming that it has no control over the labor practices of its suppliers. “Florida growers have a right to run their businesses how they see fit,” a Burger King spokesman told The St. Petersburg Times.

“Yet the company has adopted a far more activist approach when the issue is the well-being of livestock. In March, Burger King announced strict new rules on how its meatpacking suppliers should treat chickens and hogs. As for human rights abuses, Burger King has suggested that if the poor farm workers of southern Florida need more money, they should apply for jobs at its restaurants.

“Three private equity firms — Bain Capital, the Texas Pacific Group and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners — control most of Burger King’s stock. Last year, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, Lloyd C. Blankfein, earned the largest annual bonus in Wall Street history, and this year he stands to receive an even larger one. Goldman Sachs has served its investors well lately, avoiding the subprime mortgage meltdown and, according to Business Week, doubling the value of its Burger King investment within three years.

“Telling Burger King to pay an extra penny for tomatoes and provide a decent wage to migrant workers would hardly bankrupt the company. Indeed, it would cost Burger King only $250,000 a year. At Goldman Sachs, that sort of money shouldn’t be too hard to find. In 2006, the bonuses of the top 12 Goldman Sachs executives exceeded $200 million — more than twice as much money as all of the roughly 10,000 tomato pickers in southern Florida earned that year. Now Mr. Blankfein should find a way to share some of his company’s good fortune with the workers at the bottom of the food chain.’

Copied from “Penny Foolish,” printed in the New York Times, November 29

Posted in Local/Metro | 3 Comments

Our Democracy Must Be Revived — If We Hope To Achieve The Dreams of Our Wisest and Best

John Dewey said, “What the best and wisest parent wants for his or her own child, that must the community want for all of its children.”

Dewey hit philosophical gold when he came up with that one sentence. It is a sentence worthy of several book length contemplations. Dewey’s sentence makes a powerful suggestion about who should most influence a community; in his view it should not be the dumb, the bigoted, the uninformed, or the political powerful who should have the most influence — it should be the wisest and the best. What a great idea.

It is interesting to contemplate what actions a school board might take, if its members were the best and the wisest citizens in the community. It is interesting to contemplate what actions the Ohio Assembly might take, if its members were the best and wisest citizens in the state. If our democracy was working as it should, and produced democratically committed quality leadership, it is a safe bet that our institutions would become transformed and we would experience revolutionary improvement in every aspect of our lives.

But our democracy is not working as it should. One good example of how our democracy does work is from a few months ago when Montgomery County Republicans announced that in my House District, the 37th, Peggy Lehner was anointed their choice to take John Husted’s place in the Ohio House. Regardless that Peggy needs to win the March 4 primary and the November election, it is widely assumed that her ascendancy to the House from her gerrymandered district is assured. The Republicans discouraged other potential Republican candidates from participating in the primary. Whether Peggy is the wisest or the best in her district or whether she is far from being so, doesn’t really matter. The Party has spoken. Clearly, our democracy is not working, because, our political system is all about projecting partisan power, not about promoting effective democratic processes.

So, how can our democracy be improved? It seems to me it will take a lot of hard work. Many more people need to be brought into the process and to bring those people into the process will require effort. The 25 or so Republicans who anointed Peggy is simply not a large enough or diverse enough group to be qualified to choose a representative for 110,000 voters. Democrats are guilty of the same types of actions. It’s not a one party failure. Our democracy is not working because both major political parties are failing us. Our democracy will improve when sufficient voters and party members demand improvement. Wouldn’t it be nice if grassroots Republicans as well as grassroots Democrats started to demand that their own parties exercise effective democratic processes, such as promoting vigorous primary contests?

I believe many voters are ready to abandon knee jerk partisanship and are hungry for their democracy to become more effective. Democrats need to try harder. And Republicans in Democratically gerrymandered districts need to try harder, too. A party that shows a commitment to reviving democracy in a gerrymandered district, and that shows a commitment to promoting good candidates in a vigorous primary contest, I believe, would receive unexpected support from voters who are sick of the current closed system. A party that would promote a vigorous primary contest, I believe, would receive support from many voters who feel neglected by their party and who would welcome a chance for meaningful political input and participation.

Wouldn’t it be great if DaytonOS could be at the center of an authentic democracy effort that would create an effective connection of voters in Montgomery County — an effort sufficient to improve our political system? This is not a small goal. As I said, to revive our democracy will take a lot of work.

Two important dates are upon us — January 4, 2008 and March 4, 2008. By January 4, 2008, we need to greatly expand the list of candidates in both parties who are seeking election to the Ohio House and the Ohio Senate. And between January 4 and March 4, we need to find ways to use the power of the internet to create authentic community where these primary candidates can have an opportunity to articulate their ideas and where they will have the opportunity to meaningfully interact with their potential constituents.

I am hoping, and I think it is possible, that DaytonOS can help create the type of community where meaningful political discussion helps wise and good ideas to emerge, a community that gives potential leaders the means to effectively communicate. I like Dewey’s sentence. It says to me that we need to revive our democratic process so that, as a community, we can identify and pursue what is wisest and what is best, and so that, as a community, we can reliably identify and elect those who will best legislate for us.

I believe here is the idea whose time has come: We need to work to vitalize our democracy so that the dreams of the wisest and best among us will come to the fore, so that the greatest hopes for our democracy can come to reality.

Posted in Opinion | 12 Comments

Few Candidates Have Returned Petitions to Run For Montgomery County Legislative Seats

With only about one month remaining before the filing deadline, there seems a lack of candidates seeking to be elected to represent Montgomery County in Ohio’s Legislative Assembly. The lack of candidates seems surprising because all but one of Montgomery County’s legislative seats are “open” seats; because of term limit laws, the incumbents are prohibited from seeking reelection to the same seat in this election cycle.

January 4, 2008 is the deadline for filing to run as a candidate for the Ohio House or the Ohio Senate. Fifty signatures are required to run as a candidate for either the Republican or Democratic Party. To run as an Independent, the number of signatures required is a percentage of votes cast within the district during the last governor’s election and for an Ohio House District the average number of signatures required is about 400 signatures. The candidates who will be chosen to represent the Republican and the Democratic Parties will be determined at the primary election to be held on March 4, 2008.

According to the Montgomery County Board of Elections, these are the candidates who have currently filed for Montgomery County’s legislative seats.

  • For Ohio House 36th District, seat currently held by Republican Arlene Setzer: Seth Morgan, Republican of Huber Heights, and Charles Morton, Democrat of New Lebanon, have filed.
  • For Ohio House 37th District, seat currently held by Republican John Husted: Peggy Lehner, Republican of Kettering, and Andrea Eveslage, Democrat of Kettering, have filed.
  • For Ohio House 38th District, seat currently held by Republican John White: Terry Blair, Republican of Centerville, and Tom Young, Republican of Centerville, have filed. John Doll, Democrat of Centerville and Chad Kingsalver, Democrat of Centerville, have filed.
  • For Ohio House 39th District, seat currently held by Democrat Clayton Luckie: Only Clayton Luckie has filed.
  • For Ohio House 40th District, seat currently held by Democrat Fred Strahorn: Ann Siefker, Republican of Dayton has filed; Victor Harris and Roland Windburn, Democrats of Dayton, have filed. And Sherry Green, Independent of Dayton, has filed.

For the Ohio Senate District 6, seat currently held by Republican Jeff Jacobsen, no one has yet filed to run for this Senate seat.

Posted in Local/Metro | 4 Comments