Paul Krugman Says Financial Sector Yearly Has $400 Billion In Waste And Fraud

Paul Krugman’s column in the New York Times today, “The Madoff Economy,” uses the $50 billion ponzi scheme of Bernard Madoff to slam the whole investment industry. Krugman says that it appears that every year there is at least $400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse in the financial sector and that this slosh of money has corrupted our whole economic and political system.

Krugman asks: “How different, really, is Mr. Madoff’s tale from the story of the investment industry as a whole? The financial services industry has claimed an ever-growing share of the nation’s income over the past generation, making the people who run the industry incredibly rich. Yet, at this point, it looks as if much of the industry has been destroying value, not creating it. And it’s not just a matter of money: the vast riches achieved by those who managed other people’s money have had a corrupting effect on our society as a whole.”

Excerpts:

  • Last year, the average salary of employees in “securities, commodity contracts, and investments” was more than four times the average salary in the rest of the economy. Earning a million dollars was nothing special, and even incomes of $20 million or more were fairly common. … The pay system on Wall Street lavishly rewards the appearance of profit, even if that appearance later turns out to have been an illusion.
  • Consider the hypothetical example of a money manager who leverages up his clients’ money with lots of debt, then invests the bulked-up total in high-yielding but risky assets … Then, when the bubble bursts and his investments turn into toxic waste, his investors will lose big — but he’ll keep those bonuses.
  • In recent years the finance sector accounted for 8 percent of America’s G.D.P., up from less than 5 percent a generation earlier. If that extra 3 percent was money for nothing — and it probably was — we’re talking about $400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse.
  • Wall Street’s ill-gotten gains corrupted and continue to corrupt politics, in a nicely bipartisan way. From Bush administration officials like Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who looked the other way as evidence of financial fraud mounted, to Democrats who still haven’t closed the outrageous tax loophole that benefits executives at hedge funds and private equity firms (hello, Senator Schumer), politicians have walked when money talked.
  • There’s an innate tendency on the part of even the elite to idolize men who are making a lot of money, and assume that they know what they’re doing. After all, that’s why so many people trusted Mr. Madoff.
  • Now, as we survey the wreckage and try to understand how things can have gone so wrong, so fast, the answer is actually quite simple: What we’re looking at now are the consequences of a world gone Madoff.
Posted in Special Reports | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who “Deserves” To Be Named Senator?

Kathleen Parker, writing on the opinion page of today’s Dayton Daily News, says, “Kennedy may not deserve seat, but it doesn’t matter.” Parker writes that, in her judgment, New York’s Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, is more deserving to be appointed US senator than Caroline Kennedy.

Parker’s assumption seems to be that discerning who is the most deserving should be the determining factor that should guide the New York governor’s choice of who to appoint to the US Senate. Evidently Parker has a criteria to judge deservingness in which Cuomo is considered more deserving because he has a longer history of public service than Kennedy, that he has worked harder, that he has accomplished more.

But, it seems to me, another way of thinking about who “deserves” appointment is to think in terms of who most deserves to be given great trust. Who deserves to be considered incorruptible and whose ideas deserve to be listened to?

Ultimately, the people our democracy should entrust with decision making authority are those people who have a vision of a common good, who are most committed to working for the common good, and who have the personal capacity to communicate and lead effectively. It is a person’s commitment to and capacity for problem solving, to promoting the general good, that should be the criteria in our democracy that most determines who “deserves” to be awarded political office.

It is a safe bet that Caroline Kennedy, in the US Senate, would be incorruptible and conscientious and that she would be guided by sound principles. I think she would protect and advance the common good and that she would, therefore, make a great senator. Caroline Kennedy, according to the above definition of deservingness that emphasizes the common good, clearly “deserves” top consideration for appointment to the senate.


Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Iraqi Shoe Thrower Should Get Significant Jail Time

David Esrati today wrote an article “Maybe we should learn to throw shoes,” in which he pooh poohed the flying shoe assault on George Bush by the irate Iraqi journalist. Esrati wrote, “If someone threw their shoes at me- would it end up in court? I doubt it. At some point, we have to realize, that heads of state aren’t gods- and the punishment shouldn’t be any longer than it would be if it happened to you or me.”

Esrati compares the shoe throwing assault to his own act of defiance of wearing a mask to a city commission meeting: “Symbolic speech without great harm. Much like wearing a mask to a city commission meeting, however this one was better understood.”

Wow. Looking around the web, it looks like a lot of irate bloggers basically agree with Esrati’s thinking.

If someone in the near future would hurl a shoe at Barack Obama while at the same time shouting the most vile epithet possible — ”You dog” — I hardly think that Esrati, or other blogging cheerleaders for the Iraqi shoe thrower, would have the same reaction. Regardless of the contempt anyone has for Bush as a person, or contempt for Bush’s policies, no-one has a right to assault any US president.

The president of the United States is distinguished by our laws and traditions with special rights and protections. After all, within the presidency resides the entire Executive branch of our government. This unique identification of this office with our government, doesn’t make the president a god, but it does mean that unique laws / traditions have been agreed to concerning the respect that should be shown toward the office of the president. Regardless of the contempt that Bush has earned personally, the office he holds deserves respect. A threat or an affront to our president is a threat and affront to us all.

This shoe throwing act, according to our laws — should it happen at a White House press conference — would not be considered simply as as affront or threat to George Bush as a person, it would be seen as threat and affront to the office of the president. Our laws would put such a shoe thrower in jail. I imagine every democratic nation has unique laws to protect the dignity and safety of its head of state.

Our laws and traditions see an assault on the president as quite different from an assault on Esrati, or on any private citizen. The idea that a head of state, as representative of a nation, deserves special laws and protections is a well established notion. If some American idiot would hurl shoes, or rocks, or rotten fruit at, say, a visiting French president, I would hope that American justice would assure that such an idiot would be punished with significant jail time.

The assault on our president is a serious matter. Bush showed good sense in downplaying the whole incident, but Iraq should mete out justice to this shoe throwing moron in a manner in keeping with what other established democracies would do. Iraq should give this shoe thrower significant jail time.

Posted in M Bock, Opinion | Tagged , , | 5 Comments