I want to comment about some of the ideas in this speech in a future post. Mike May in this video explains that he taught for 33 years. He is the ranking member of the education committee in Iowa’s House of Representatives
-
Archives
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- May 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- October 2021
- May 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- December 2015
- February 2015
- October 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
-
Meta
Mike, the press release was titled Iowa GOP Announces Bold Public Education Reform Measures. The Iowa GOP plan is pretty much the Strickland/Ohio Democratic plan, but without the disasterous policy blunders which undermine human rights (e.g. CERD).
Fine. It’s not much of a vision. But after blizzards are vision is sometimes just getting to a cleared road. The Iowa GOP is closer to plowing snow than long-range planning. It takes both.
Same old same old. I guess Mike May was so busy running his resort that he couldn’t keep up with what was happening in education.
He thinks that testing and assessment are two different things? If not, why does he point up “assessment” as a separate point?
Nowhere in his little oration does he point up some of the bigger problems of urban districts: discipline and poverty. Perhaps the kids in Ames are all well-behaved and enjoying the same enriched home environments as the kids in Oakwood.
He says that when he started teaching 33 years ago there were no curricular standards. That’s right: the “education reformers” did away with them. He wants curricular standards based on international models (I bet he does not want health care based on the same!) rather than curricular standards based on existing research into age-appropriate standards. And perhaps he’s short on time but he doesn’t seem to recognize that there should be 3 curricula: one for special education students (and that one very individualized), one for the 85% or so in the middle, and a more adventurous and self-paced one for the honors students.
And he, like so many others, completely misses the main point; education happens when a teacher connects with a student. We reduce the potential for that connection when we complicate schools with too many administrators, too many restrictions, too much outcomes testing, too much trivia. When will teachers return to the upper half of professional salaries (they’re currently in the bottom 20%) and when will class sizes be kept reasonable?
Mays has missed that good Kentucky axiom: you don’t make the pig fat by weighing it.
Eric: pretty much the Strickland/Ohio Democratic plan, but without the disasterous policy blunders…
truddick : Nowhere in his little oration does he point up some of the bigger problems of urban districts: discipline and poverty.
So how do the Strickland/Ohio Democratic ed “reforms” address discipline and poverty? By promising more money when Ohio’s economy improves?
When will teachers return to the upper half of professional salaries (they’re currently in the bottom 20%) and when will class sizes be kept reasonable?
Is that the plan for addressing discipline and poverty? Will it work for Dayton? Will the Dayton NAACP buy it? Why do Ohio’s current reforms look so much like what was tried in Dayton without getting the results promised in court?
Eric, you’re rather good at coming up with questions. But you’ve already heard many of the answers. So let me toss a few questions at you.
Do you recognize that, by the measures the state has imposed, Dayton has made improvements in its public schools?
Do you understand that those improvements would be greater if there had not been budget problems? If not, why not? Do you think any other professional is expected to do a job without being provided all the necessary tools and supplies?
Would Dayton (and all districts) retain experienced, good teachers if salaries were higher? (Currently most new teachers quit the profession–usually because they can make more elsewhere–in their first five years. Did you know that?)
Students in inner-city environments currently see few positive role models. What would they think if, every school day, they encountered teachers who were reasonably prosperous, who drove nice cars and who didn’t worry about whether they’d be able to pay their heating bills? Do you think that teachers would accept some standards (say, testing and a dress code) in return for incomes that were genuinely professional-level?
If you’re deeply concerned about education, do you work in the profession? If not, why?
If you want your plumbing repaired, do you ask a state legislator who doesn’t live in his district–or a foundation director who advanced several “reforms” that made things worse? Then why do people expect them to be able to fix schools (or anything much for that matter)?
I await your answers.
I’d expect a state legislator to attend to needs assessments done by the school districts the legislator represents. That should be an open record. It should meet legal requirements (for Dayton, including the unitary status settlement). Board members, administrators, and all unions should be totally bought in.
So where is the document, and why were Dayton’s representatives unable to convince Governor Strickland that it is was of sufficient quality to be included in the Governor’s 400-item “reform” bibliography. Instead, we have Summit County representatives telling us that out-of-state professors have–in an unprecedented act–applied science to determine what’s best for Dayton’s kids.