Governor Strickland Offers Five Point Plan To “Build Ohio’s Education System Anew”

Governor Ted Strickland, dedicated a big part of his State of the State speech today giving details of his five point plan to “build our education system anew.”

Strickland said, “The plan is based on a very simple premise: we should design our education system around what works. I have embraced an evidence-based education approach that harnesses research results and applies those findings to Ohio’s specific circumstances.”

Here is what Strickland said about his five points:

First, what we teach and how we teach will prepare Ohioans to thrive in the 21st Century.

  • Students will, of course, continue to learn the timeless core subjects like math and science that are critical to their success. But we will also add new topics including global awareness and life skills to the curriculum. And we will use teaching methods that foster creativity and innovation, critical thinking and problem solving, communication and collaboration, media literacy, leadership and productivity, cultural awareness, adaptability and accountability.
  • These are the skills that help people thrive in their lives. These are the skills our business leaders look for in the people they hire. These are the skills we find in people who create jobs, create products, and create entirely new industries.
  • Under my plan, the Ohio Department of Education will set standards for Ohio schools requiring innovative teaching formats. Interdisciplinary methods, project-based learning, real world lessons, and service learning will be the norm.

Second, under my plan, we will expand learning opportunities.

  • The learning experience will be built around the individual student. Lessons will not end when a fact is memorized. Students will be given a chance to interact with information, to follow up on the subjects that fascinate, to think critically and creatively and to use what they’ve learned to draw conclusions.
  • Our schools are not assembly lines and our students are not widgets. We will teach to each individual student’s need because we recognize that it is the surest path to seeing our young people reach their full potential.
  • Over a ten-year period we will add 20 instructional days to the school calendar – bringing Ohio’s learning year up to the international average of 200 days.
  • We will end the outdated practice of giving our most impressionable students only a half-day of learning. Ohio will now require universal all-day kindergarten.
  • We will provide resources to expand the learning day for all students with activities such as community service, tutoring, and wellness programs.
  • We will build on our ‘Closing the Achievement Gap’ initiative to take what we’ve learned from the existing program to help us provide enhanced intervention services in schools with high dropout rates.
  • We will create community engagement teams in our schools. We will place nurses in our schools. We will have professionals in the schools who will help educators, families and community service providers come together to help our children succeed.
  • And for the first time the state will provide dedicated resources for instructional materials and enrichment activities.
  • We will celebrate learning with new academic achievement competitions and awards that make learning as publicly praised as athletics. With the creation of the Ohio Academic Olympics, students will compete in science, in math, in writing, in debate, in the arts, and in technology.

Third, under my plan, we will improve educator quality.

  • There is simply nothing that we as policymakers can influence in our schools that is as consequential as providing top quality teachers for our students.
  • We will revolutionize teacher preparation and development in Ohio with a residency program. Just as future doctors begin their careers under the watchful eye of an experienced colleague, we will give our new teachers the benefit of thoughtful guidance from an accomplished senior teacher. After a four-year residency, successful candidates will earn their professional teaching license.
  • We will recognize the development of a teacher’s skills and accomplishments with a career ladder that begins with their residency and can build up to lead teacher, a person whose credentials, experience, and student results warrant additional responsibilities. That means for the first time our teachers will have the opportunity to advance their careers based on objective evidence of student progress.
  • Our lead teachers will play an active role in overseeing new teachers in the residency program and assisting all their colleagues.
  • We will provide collaborative planning time so that the best ideas of the best teachers can spread across a school and reach the most students. Mentoring, coaching and peer review will be a standard part of a teacher’s job.
  • We will harness the expertise of the Chancellor of Higher Education and the Superintendent of Public Instruction to collaborate on professional development programs and innovative techniques for the classroom.
  • We will create a Teach Ohio program to open a path to licensure for professionals who have the subject knowledge but lack coursework in education methods. Teach Ohio participants will complete an intensive course in classroom methods and then be eligible to begin the four-year residency program.
  • Scholarships will be made available for future teachers who agree to teach in hard to staff schools or in hard to staff subjects.
  • Our university teacher education programs will be redesigned to meet the needs and standards of our primary and secondary schools. The Chancellor of Higher Education will be empowered to reward university education programs that best prepare their students for success as teachers in Ohio.
  • We will strengthen our licensing standards for school principals while giving them the ability and the responsibility to properly manage their schools.
  • We will create standards for the mastery of both education and management principles for school superintendents, school treasurers and other business officials.
  • And you know, good ideas shouldn’t be something we stumble on accidentally. That’s why my plan creates a research and development function within the Department of Education. The department’s Center for Creativity and Innovation will monitor research and results from across the country and across the world to keep Ohio schools and Ohio educators informed of new advances.

Fourth, under my plan, we will measure ourselves against the world.

  • Ohio’s current graduation test does not measure creativity, problem solving, and other key skills. We will make our assessments both relevant and rigorous by replacing the Ohio Graduation Test with the ACT and three additional measures.
  • All students will take the ACT college entrance examination, not only to measure their high school achievement, but to help raise students’ aspirations for higher education. Students will also take statewide ‘end of course’ exams, complete a service learning project, and submit a senior project.
  • These four measures will give our graduating high school seniors the opportunity to demonstrate knowledge, creativity, and problem solving skills, in short, to demonstrate precisely the skills that will help them succeed in life.
  • In grades 3 through 8, our assessments will also be entirely rewritten to test for mastery of the information and skills in the curriculum.
  • Our goal in our teaching and in our testing is nothing short of national and international leadership.

Fifth, under my plan, we will establish an unprecedented level of school district accountability and transparency.

  • School districts will undergo performance audits overseen by the Department of Education to make sure they are maintaining the academic and operating standards we’ve established.
  • Districts will report their spending plans before each school year and then account for every dollar at the conclusion of the school year.
  • And just as we provide an academic report card for our schools, we will provide parents, public officials, and taxpayers an annual fiscal and operational report card for every school district. That means that when we send districts funding to help students who need additional attention and instruction, we will now be able to track our dollars to see that they directly reach those students.
  • Failure to comply with our standards will result, first, in the assigning of technical assistance to help a school district correct its deficiencies. If the problem persists, a district will be required to present a comprehensive plan outlining how it will reach full compliance with our academic and operating standards. Continued failure would result in the district being placed in receivership, with entirely new leadership installed. And finally, if the district remains non-compliant, the State Board of Education would be required to revoke the school district’s charter. In short, if a school district fails, we will shut it down.
  • And, as we establish a new level of accountability in our school districts, we must also establish accountability in our charter schools. For those who may have misunderstood my position on charter schools, I want to be very clear. I support charter schools that meet the same high standards we demand of traditional public schools. Charter schools that hire quality teachers, show fiscal and academic accountability, are regulated by the Department of Education, and are not run by for-profit management services have a place in my plan.
Share
This entry was posted in Special Reports and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Governor Strickland Offers Five Point Plan To “Build Ohio’s Education System Anew”

  1. Stan Hirtle says:

    Making teaching more collegial, as happens in other countries, would probably be a good thing.
    What would be the economic effect of this 4 year “internship?” Is this a low pay period? Is this what we need? Supposedly large numbers of teachers choose to do something else in their first 5 years the way it is now. Is the first few years where the legendary “bad teachers” are made? Or do they burn out, particularly at the most difficult and unpleasant to work in schools? How do we keep alive the reasons they went into teaching in the first place?

    Are we going to pay lead teachers more for their mastery? Pay all teachers for the extra time we are demanding?

    If we are rewarding teachers based on how well their kids do we will probably still be rewarding teachers in middle class schools with advantaged kids. What about this plan will change this dynamic?

    Getting more than high stakes standardized tests is a plus. As is trying for a broader sense fo citizenship.
    Will this plan have the political saleability to get the suburbs to invest in educating the city?

    Supposing the system is doing badly. The state shuts it down. Then what?

  2. Eric says:

    Will this plan have the political saleability to get the suburbs to invest in educating the city?

    Stan, your question is important but it could mean several things. Could you be more explicit?

    … The state shuts it down.

    The already has this power. “Then what” is the hard part. I’d divide up the failing districts and merge the pieces with its better-off neighbors–that’s doable. And it will incent neighboring districts to ensure the doomsday scenario doesn’t happen.

  3. Stan Hirtle says:

    I think fixing City schools will require support from suburbs. Ideally expertise on how to run school systems as well as willingness to have taxes from suburbs go to city schools as well as the suburban schools. But suburbs exist and attract people who want to escape from urban schools, and without ther school advantage people may choose to move to the City. This is not just true in Dayton, it is true everywhere. During the deRolph case appeals, the legislature was run by suburban legislators and they didn’t do anything to satisfy the Supreme Court. DeRolph was mostly about rural areas with low tax bases rather than cities with enormous needs, but the result is the same. Every suburban system sees itself as an island, and people are not seeing that the whole region sinks or floats with the urban core.

    So will the suburbs buy Strickland’s plan politically? Financial accountability and the ability to fire teachers are often articulated issues of objection to spending money on urban schools, and Strickland purports to deal with this. I thought he got an ovation from the R side when he mentioned firing teachers, but I don’t really know for sure. There is a lot of hostility to the urban systems which are viewed by many as an employment program for poor performing administrators, often from minority communities, so the ability to throw them out is also attractive (replace them with what is the question. State government people? How will they do better? Force them to merge with the suburban systems? You admit how unpopular that would be, although it will encourage suburbanites supporting adequate state funding). I am always concerned that voters want their kids to be better educated than other peoples kids, knowing that there are only so many slots in the educated middle class. Even Vermont voters have resisted sharing a small percentage of school levy revenues with poorer school systems, which makes me wonder. In any case, real property taxes are a terrible way to fund schools, because the tax is not connected with the ability to pay it and creates a huge number of no votes from people who own houses but have low or fixed incomes.

  4. Mike Bock says:

    Eric, you write, “I’d divide up the failing (city) districts and merge the pieces with its better-off (suburban) neighbors–that’s doable.”

    I can’t agree that such a radical solution is doable. I would expect suburban districts to adamantly oppose such a solution. And I would expect the suburban opposition to be successful. The huge effort needed to push such mergers would, in the end, simply be wasted effort and a failed effort to merge would demoralize the city districts even more. The only solution that, to me, seems possible is to restructure city schools so that, over time, they can become successful. Any citizen effort or energy available to push for education improvement would be better applied to restructuring efforts, rather than to merging efforts. If city schools can become successful with options and opportunities that far exceed suburban opportunities, then the possibility of city/suburban education cooperation would be greatly improved.

    Stan, you write, “I am always concerned that voters want their kids to be better educated than other peoples kids, knowing that there are only so many slots in the educated middle class.”

    Yes, I think it is natural impulse for parents to want to give their children as many advantages as possible. This impulse should be channeled into positive actions. Many parents in suburban schools believe the hype that, according to state criteria, their districts are “excellent,” when, in fact, their schools are far from being so. The natural desire of parents to want the best for their children should be a force to transform public education, but the system has so far diverted this force.

  5. Tim says:

    If you are against Governor Ted Strickland’s plan to add 20 extra school days to the school year, please sign my petition! THANKS!!

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ohio-governor-ted-strickland-trying-to-add-20-extra-days-to-the-school-year

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *